John Hood Co. v. American Pneumatic Service Co.

Decision Date02 March 1906
Citation191 Mass. 27,77 N.E. 638
PartiesJOHN HOOD CO. v. AMERICAN PNEUMATIC SERVICE CO.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
COUNSEL

Chas. G. Chick, for plaintiff.

Edwin C. Cilman and Jas. T. Pugh, for defendant.

OPINION

LATHROP, J.

The rules of law applicable to this case are well settled. A common carrier may limit its liability in case of loss by stipulating concerning the value of the property which it undertakes to convey; but this stipulation must be brought home to the knowledge of the shipper under such circumstances that his assent to it can fairly be assumed to have been given. And if he accepts and acts upon it without dissent he will be presumed to have agred to it. Graves v. Adams Express Co., 176 Mass. 280, 282, 57 N.E. 462, and cases cited. It is possible, but we think not probable, that the case was decided upon this ground.

A better ground to rest the decision upon is that there was evidence of ratification by the manager of the defendant company of the act of Green, the defendant's clerk. There was evidence that Green said to the treasurer of the plaintiff company, when he called at the office to see about the lost package, and asked to see the manager: 'It is unnecessary to see the manager, we are responsible, the receipt amounts to nothing. Go ahead and replace the goods, and if the bill is O. K., we will pay it.' There was also evidence that when the president of the plaintiff company saw later the manager of the defendant company and told him what Green had said, the manager said: 'Never mind now; I will look into it. You present your bill any way, and, if it is as you say, and a just bill, we will pay it.' No question was made at the trial as to the justness of the bill, and the only defense was the limitation of liability in the receipt to $5. Metcalf v. Williams, 144 Mass. 452, 11 N.E. 700, and cases cited.

Exceptions overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Homer v. Oregon Short Line Railroad Co.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • December 5, 1912
    ... ... 33; ... Graves v. Express Co., 176 Mass. 280; John Hood ... v. American Exp. Co., 77 N.E. 638; Brehme v ... the transportation service must be incorporated in the ... schedules, which are filed ... ...
  • Muelder v. Western Greyhound Lines
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • May 28, 1970
    ...of Congress * * *.' (173 N.W. at p. 180). Other states have likewise declined to follow the federal rule. (Hood Co. v. American Pneumatic Service Co. (1906) 191 Mass. 27, 77 N.E. 638; Hill v. Adams Express Co. (1911) 82 N.J.L. 373, 81 A. 859; Erie R. Co. v. Steinberg (1916) 94 Ohio St. 189,......
  • Hooker v. Boston & M.R.r.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • September 6, 1911
    ... ... [209 Mass. 600] ... service.--One hundred fifty pounds of personal baggage not ... Adams Express Co., 176 Mass. 280, 57 N.E. 462; ... John Hood Co. v. American Pneumatic Service Co., 191 ... Mass ... ...
  • McGregor v. Oregon R. Co.
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • January 28, 1908
    ... ... 534] ... 245; Gott v. Dinsmore, 111 Mass. 45; John Hood ... Co. v. Am. P.S. Co., 191 Mass. 27, 77 N.E ... Balt. & O.R. Co., 45 N.Y. 712; ... American Ex. Co. v. Spellman, 90 Ill. 455; ... Phoenix Powder ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT