John Silvey & Co. v. Brown

Decision Date15 November 1911
PartiesJOHN SILVEY & CO. et al. v. BROWN.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

An alleged statement of facts not being set forth in the bill of exceptions, nor made a part of the same as an exhibit thereto and properly authenticated, what purports to be an agreed statement of facts, sent up as a part of the record, but not approved by the judge and ordered filed as such, cannot be considered by this court. Robinson v. Woodward, 134 Ga. 777, 68 S.E. 553; Blackman v. Garrett, 135 Ga. 226, 69 S.E. 110.

The errors assigned in the bill of exceptions being such as cannot be determined from the record without a consideration of such alleged agreed statement of facts so sent up, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed. Id.

Acts 1911, p. 150, § 3, is applicable, according to its terms, exclusively to motions for a new trial, and is not applicable to this case, wherein there was no motion for a new trial.

Error from Superior Court, Lowndes County; J. H. Merrill, Judge.

Action between John Silvey & Co. and others and Jack Brown. From the judgment, Silvey & Co. and others bring error. Affirmed.

W. C. Lane, Jno. R. L. Smith, and Hardeman, Jones, Callaway & Johnston, for plaintiffs in error.

Woodward & Smith, for defendant in error.

FISH, C.J.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except BECK, J., absent, and HILL, J., not presiding.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT