Johnson v. State, 91-1035

Decision Date26 January 1993
Docket NumberNo. 91-1035,91-1035
Parties18 Fla. L. Week. D400 Winston JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Glen P. Gifford, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Charlie McCoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

KAHN, Judge.

Winston Johnson, convicted of robbery and classified and sentenced as an habitual offender by the trial court, brings this appeal.

On September 12, 1990, Elizabeth Wilson, the victim, held in her closed right fist $240.00 while she waited to purchase a bus ticket at the Gainesville Greyhound station. Johnson approached from her right, reached across her shoulder, "raked" her hand and grabbed the money. In the process of taking the cash, Johnson used sufficient force to tear a scab off Ms. Wilson's finger. Johnson made no statements during the transaction, and touched Ms. Wilson only during the process of taking the money. When apprehended, Johnson admitted to police that he took the money, stating that he needed it to purchase crack cocaine. On these facts the trial court denied a defense motion for judgment of acquittal on the robbery charge, and the jury returned with a conviction.

At sentencing, the state sought habitual offender treatment pursuant to notice under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989). Accordingly, the state presented appropriate evidence concerning Johnson's criminal record. Upon hearing the evidence, the trial court stated:

What I'm going to do is this: You are a habitual offender; when you commit an offense, you are habitualized because of your record; there's no choice.

* * * * * *

I'm going to declare you a habitual offender and sentence you to seven years in the Department of Corrections; that's the lowest under the permitted range I can go.

Johnson now argues that his motion for judgment of acquittal was improperly denied, habitual offender classification was not mandatory, despite certain language in the statute, and that in any event the trial court was not obligated to impose sentence pursuant to the habitual offender statute. We affirm the robbery conviction, but agree with Johnson on the sentencing issue, and remand to the trial court.

Robbery is distinguished from larceny by the perpetrator's use of force. "The degree of force used is immaterial. All the force that is required to make the offense a robbery is such force as is actually sufficient to overcome the victim's resistance." Montsdoca v. State, 84 Fla. 82, 93 So. 157, 159 (1922) (citations omitted); see also, McCloud v. State, 335 So.2d 257 (Fla.1976). In the present case the evidence establishes that Ms. Wilson was holding money in her closed right fist and that Johnson used sufficient force to remove the money, and in the process to cause slight injury to Ms. Wilson's hand. The robbery statute...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • United States v. Lee
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • April 2, 2018
    ...See Johnson v. United States , ––– U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 2557-60, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). The following year, the Court held that Johnson applied retroactively on collateral review. See Welch v. United States , ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 1257, 1268, 194 L.Ed.2d 387 (2016).Michael Lee was......
  • White v. State, 91-3959
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 17, 1993
    ...to classify and sentence him as such pursuant to section 775.084(1)(b) and (4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989). See Johnson v. State, 612 So.2d 689 (Fla. 1st DCA1993); Grimes v. State, 616 So.2d 996 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Cf. King v. State, 597 So.2d 309, 314-15 (Fla. 2d DCA) (en banc) (finding t......
  • London v. State, 92-2048
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 24, 1993
    ...The issue of separation of powers has also been resolved in Grimes v. State, 616 So.2d 996 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), and Johnson v. State, 612 So.2d 689 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), wherein this court held that the trial court was not required to classify or sentence a defendant with a criminal record a......
  • United States v. Henry
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Kentucky
    • December 10, 2018
    ...Johnson, 559 U.S. at 138. Because "[t]he degree of force used is immaterial" for purposes of Florida robbery, Johnson v. Florida, 612 So. 2d 689, 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993) (citation omitted), the offense does not "ha[ve] as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT