Johnson v. State, 3D01-2021.
| Decision Date | 03 September 2003 |
| Docket Number | No. 3D01-2021.,3D01-2021. |
| Citation | 858 So.2d 1071 |
| Parties | Robert JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Joseph A. Brophy, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.
Before GODERICH, GREEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied November 7, 2003.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING GRANTED
The opinion filed November 6, 2002 is withdrawn, and the following is substituted in its place.
Robert Johnson was convicted of (among other offenses) one count of battery on a law enforcement officer and was sentenced as a violent career criminal as provided by section 775.084, Florida Statutes (2001). We reverse, and remand for resentencing.
Johnson's current (battery) offense, spitting on a law enforcement officer, is not one of the forcible felonies enumerated in section 776.08 and does not amount to "the use or threat of use of physical force or violence" as provided by that section.1 Battery is a qualifying offense where the defendant struck or intentionally caused bodily harm to another person. § 784.03(1)(a)1, 2, Fla. Stat. (2001). While spitting on a law enforcement officer amounts to an unwanted touching, it does not amount to the use or threat of use of physical force or violence. Johnson's spitting offense is not a qualifying one for sentencing as a violent career criminal.
Because Johnson does not have any current qualifying offense that would authorize application of the violent career criminal sentencing statute, we reverse and remand for a new sentencing proceeding in accordance with this opinion.
1. Imposition of a violent career criminal sentence requires the trial court find that, in addition to three or more prior qualifying felony convictions, the defendant's current conviction must also be a qualifying offense. See § 775.084(1)(d)(1)a-g, (2),(3), Fla. Stat. (2001).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Banks v. Jones
...Judicial Circuit, Petitioner essentially argued that he could not be assigned to Close Management I housing, citing Johnson v. State, 858 So.2d 1071 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), which held that spitting in a law enforcement officer's face was not a forcible felony involving violence as defined under......
-
Hobbs v. State
...whether a Wyoming domestic battery conviction is a predicate offense for a felony federal firearm conviction); Johnson v. State, 858 So.2d 1071, 1072 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2003) (examining whether battery conviction for spitting on a law enforcement officer was a qualifying offense for sentencin......
-
U.S. v. Gonzalez-Chavez, 04-40173.
...the use, attempted use, or threatened use of force, for example, it can be committed by spitting on a pregnant woman. See Johnson v. State, 858 So.2d 1071, 1072 (2003) (holding that just because spitting on someone certainly "amounts to an unwanted touching, it does not amount to the use or......
-
Jenkins v. State, 1D03-1066.
...but it based this conclusion upon the evidence in the case, rather than the statutory elements of the offense, in Johnson v. State, 858 So.2d 1071 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (on mot. for reh'g) (holding that Johnson's conviction for battery by spitting on an LEO was not a qualifying offense under t......