Johnson v. United States
| Decision Date | 22 March 2012 |
| Docket Number | Nos. C 09–3064–MWB, CR 01–3046–MWB.,s. C 09–3064–MWB, CR 01–3046–MWB. |
| Citation | Johnson v. United States , 860 F. Supp. 2d 663, 82 Fed.R.Serv.3d 128 (N.D. Iowa 2012) |
| Parties | Angela JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Marcia A. Morrissey, Santa Monica, CA, Michael Burt, Law Office of Michael Burt, Mohammad Ali Hamoudi, Nancy S. Pemberton, Pemberton & Associates, San Francisco, CA, Michael Edward Lawlor, Lawlor & Englert, LLC, Greenbelt, MD, Ilann M. Maazel, Kennisha A. Austin, Emery, Celli, Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP, New York, NY, for Petitioner.
Charles J. Williams, U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Iowa, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER'S MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT FEDERAL CAPITAL CONVICTIONS AND DEATH SENTENCES
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
63 cases
-
Langdeaux v. Lund
...of the history of federal habeas relief, before and after it was extended to state prisoners, is set out in Johnson v. United States, 860 F. Supp. 2d 663, 737 n.23 (N.D. Iowa 2012). 5. Although the Court in Strickland found that it was only necessary to consider the "prejudice" prong, so th......
-
United States v. Johnson
...in part, Johnson's § 2255 Motion by vacating her four death sentences and one life sentence for CCE murder. Johnson v. United States, 860 F. Supp. 2d 663 (N.D. Iowa 2012). The prosecution then opted for a resentencing hearing before a new jury, i.e. , a "penalty retrial," pursuant to former......
-
United States v. Johnson
...enterprise (CCE murder), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848(e), a provision of the Anti–Drug Abuse Act (ADAA). See Johnson v. United States, 860 F.Supp.2d 663 (N.D.Iowa 2012). The prosecution then opted for a “penalty retrial,” to determine the penalty for Johnson's convictions, rather than wi......
-
United States v. Johnson
...in part, Johnson's § 2255 Motion by vacating her four death sentences and one life sentence for CCE murder. Johnson v. United States, 860 F.Supp.2d 663 (N.D.Iowa 2012). The prosecution then opted for a resentencing hearing before a new jury, i.e., a “penalty retrial,” pursuant to former 21 ......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Shifting the Burden: Presuming Prejudice for Failing to Contact an Alibi Witness.
...d sub nom. Lambert v. Mackie, No. 16-2241, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18068 (6th Cir. Mar. 24, 2017). (81.) See Johnson v. United States, 860 F. Supp. 2d 663, 777, 920 (N.D. Iowa 2012) (describing trial counsel's performance and calling it "grossly constitutionally inadequate"); Bledsoe v. State,......
-
Shifting the Burden: Presuming Prejudice for Failing to Contact an Alibi Witness.
...sub nom. Lambert v. Mackie, No. 16-2241, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18068 (6th Cir. Mar. 24, 2017). (81.) See Johnson v. United States, 860 F. Supp. 2d 663, 777, 920 (N.D. Iowa 2012) (describing trial counsel's performance and calling it "grossly constitutionally inadequate"); Bledsoe v. State, 1......