Jones v. State, 11-85-110-CR
Decision Date | 04 February 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 11-85-110-CR,11-85-110-CR |
Citation | 745 S.W.2d 94 |
Parties | Gayle Lee JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
The facts in this case are set forth in this Court's opinion dated January 16, 1986, and in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion dated November 25, 1987 . The Court of Criminal Appeals vacated this Court's original decision and remanded the cause for further proceedings "not inconsistent" with its opinion.
The audio portion of the videotape which the jury heard has now been transcribed. 1 It reads in full as shown:
We hold that appellant timely and specifically invoked her rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Garner v. State, 2-87-079-CR
...should have been sustained. Jones v. State, 742 S.W.2d 398, 401-02 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) (en banc), on remand, 745 S.W.2d 94 (Tex.App.--Eastland 1988, pet. granted) holds the audio taken with video of the defendant during a field sobriety test should not have been put in evidence. The opinion......
-
Jones v. State
...know [is] reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response' and 'thus amounts to interrogation.' " Jones v. State, 745 S.W.2d 94 (Tex.App.--Eastland 1988, pet. granted). The State then petitioned for review of this second holding of the Court of Appeals. As stated above, we hold in thi......
-
Chadwick v. State
...to testimonially incriminate himself. See Jones v. State, 742 S.W.2d 398, 407 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), on remand, 745 S.W.2d 94, 96 (Tex.App.--Eastland 1988, pet. granted); Mills v. State, 720 S.W.2d 525, 526 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); McCambridge v. State, 712 S.W.2d 499, 501-07 Having found error, ......
-
Smith v. State, 01-87-00805-CR
...refusing to furnish evidence and invoking constitutional rights. All of this probably weakened his case before the jury. Compare Jones v. State, 745 S.W.2d 94 (Tex.App.--Eastland, 1988, no pet.) (not yet reported); Knox v. State, 722 S.W.2d 793, 795 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1987, no The sole poi......