Jones v. State, 87-2427

Decision Date01 June 1988
Docket NumberNo. 87-2427,87-2427
Parties13 Fla. L. Weekly 1311 Johnnie Lee JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Margaret Good, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert S. Jaegers, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

HERSEY, Chief Judge.

Appellant was convicted of third degree murder, grand theft and leaving the scene of an accident involving death or injury. The trial court deviated from the guidelines on the basis that appellant was a habitual offender. This court reversed the departure sentence in Jones v. State, 502 So.2d 1375 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), relying on State v. Whitehead, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986).

On remand the trial court found that the recommended guidelines range was three to seven years. The court then used three previously unarticulated reasons as grounds for aggravating the sentence to twenty-five years.

Because the sole reason initially given for departure from the guidelines, habitual offender status, was found invalid on appeal, the trial court cannot, upon resentencing, exceed the recommended sentence by ascribing new reasons for departure. See Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987).

Shull holds that a trial court may not enunciate new reasons for a departure sentence after the reasons given for the original departure sentence have been reversed by an appellate court. This is precisely the situation involved in the instant case except that the trial court called its re-departure an "aggravation" of the presumptive sentence. Whether called "departure" or "aggravation," the result is the same and, under Shull, is unacceptable.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING WITHIN THE GUIDELINES.

LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Jones v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 1 mars 1990
    ...recommended sentence by ascribing the new reasons for departure. See Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987). Jones v. State, 526 So.2d 173, 174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) [Jones II ]. The mandate for Jones II was issued on July 8, 1988, and a third sentencing was held on August 11, 1988. The tr......
  • Jones v. State, s. 87-2427
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 29 mars 1989
    ...for its upward departure from the sentencing guidelines. This court again reversed and remanded for resentencing. Jones v. State, 526 So.2d 173 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). In that opinion we did not address the adequacy of the reasons for departure. We relied instead upon the rationale of Shull v.......
  • Jones v. State, 90-3278
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 18 décembre 1991
    ...made. That sentence was also appealed and reversed based on Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Jones v. State, 526 So.2d 173 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (Jones II). On the third resentencing in August of 1988, restitution was not mentioned, and the court imposed a sentence of 50 ye......
  • Jones v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 13 juin 1989
    ...869 545 So.2d 869 Jones (Johnnie Lee) v. State NO. 74,004 Supreme Court of Florida. JUN 13, 1989 Appeal From: 4th DCA 526 So.2d 173, 540 So.2d 245 Accepted jurisdiction. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT