Jones v. State
| Decision Date | 27 October 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 67206,67206 |
| Citation | 168 Ga.App. 652,310 S.E.2d 17 |
| Parties | JONES v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Earl A. Davidson, Atlanta, for appellant.
Lewis R. Slaton, Dist. Atty., Joseph J. Drolet, J. Wallace Speed, Asst. Dist. Attys., for appellee.
Johnny Jones appeals his conviction of two charges of burglary. The two offenses were committed two months apart, both occurred in the morning, and both included single unit residences located in the Buckhead area of Atlanta, about four miles apart. Entrance to one dwelling was gained by breaking out a ground-floor window; entrance to the second was gained by breaking the windows of both an outside and inside door. In each instance, the property taken was jewelry. Held:
1. Appellant enumerates as error the denial by the trial court of a motion for severance of the offenses. Our Supreme Court has held it mandatory that the trial court, upon motion of the defendant, order a severance "where the offenses [have been] joined solely on the ground that they are of the same or similar character ..." Dingler v. State, 233 Ga. 462, 464, 211 S.E.2d 752 (1975). In the instant case, the offenses were not only of the same character, they were "so similar as to evidence a common plan or scheme and revealed an identical modus operandi." Davis v. State, 158 Ga.App. 549(1), 550, 281 S.E.2d 305 (1981). Each would accordingly have been admissible to prove the other, and the trial court did not err in refusing to grant a severance. See Mack v. State, 163 Ga.App. 778(1), 296 S.E.2d 115 (1982).
2. Appellant further contends that a statement made by the prosecuting attorney during closing argument to the effect that the state's evidence had not been rebutted constituted an improper reference to his failure to testify. It is well established that the prosecuting attorney may argue that the state's evidence is uncontradicted, unrefuted, or unrebutted. See generally Smith v. State, 245 Ga. 205, 264 S.E.2d 15 (1980); Burgess v. State, 158 Ga.App. 593, 281 S.E.2d 337 (1981); Hampton v. State, 158 Ga.App. 324(6), 280 S.E.2d 158 (1981). This enumeration of error is accordingly without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ridgeway v. State
...549 (1), 281 S.E.2d 305 (1981). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion to sever. Jones v. State, 168 Ga.App. 652, 310 S.E.2d 17 (1983); Johnson v. State, 158 Ga.App. 398, 280 S.E.2d 419 (1981). Davis v. State, 159 Ga.App. 356 (1), 283 S.E.2d 286 (1981). 3......
-
Wingfield v. State, A97A2274
...have been admissible to prove the other, and the trial court did not err in refusing to grant a severance. [Cit.]" Jones v. State, 168 Ga.App. 652(1), 310 S.E.2d 17 (1983). 2. In his second enumeration of error, Wingfield contends the trial court erred in refusing to give two requested jury......
-
Swinney v. State
...permitting evidence of the others. (Cit.) ...' Gilbert v. State, 163 Ga.App. 688, 690 (295 SE2d 173) (1982). Accord Jones v. State, 168 Ga.App. 652(1) (310 SE2d 17) (1983)." Jordan v. State, 172 Ga.App. 496(1), 497, 323 S.E.2d 657, 3. Defendant contends the trial court erred in allowing evi......
-
Kemp v. State, s. A91A1203
...SE2d 540) (1988)." (Punctuation omitted.) Herring v. State, 191 Ga.App. 798, 799(1), 383 S.E.2d 178 (1989). Accord Jones v. State, 168 Ga.App. 652(1), 310 S.E.2d 17 (1983). Even though the offense of possession with intent to distribute occurred on a different date than the offense of traff......