Jones v. State, 53241
| Decision Date | 11 January 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 53241,No. 3,53241,3 |
| Citation | 232 S.E.2d 365,141 Ga.App. 17 |
| Parties | Larry JONES v. The STATE |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
E. Earl Seals, Hamilton, for appellant.
E. Mullins Whisnant, Dist. Atty., Hamilton, Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for appellee.
Larry Jones was tried and convicted of first degree forgery and sentenced to serve two years in the penitentiary. He appeals, asserting that the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict of not guilty because the state failed to prove that he had knowledge that the check was forged or that he had an intent to defraud, which are elements of the crime of forgery in the first degree (Code Ann. § 26-1701); and in denying his motion for new trial on the general grounds. We affirm the trial court.
Briefly stated, the evidence adduced upon the trial was as follows: Cindy Kinsey testified that she was a teller at the Farmers and Merchants Bank in Harris County on January 2, 1976; that on that day Larry Jones presented to her for cashing a welfare check dated January 1 in the amount of $148 payable to Mrs. Suzziette Jones; that the check was endorsed 'Larry Jones' and 'Mrs. Suzziette Jones'; that she had seen Larry Jones around town and knew him; and that she stamped the check with her teller stamp and gave him $148. She identified Larry Jones in court as the person who presented the check to her. A copy of the check was attached to the indictment.
Suzziette Jones testified that Larry Jones was her brother-in-law; that she had been receiving welfare checks for almost a year prior to January, 1976; that she normally received checks on the first of the month; that she did not get the check dated January 1, 1976; that the name 'Mrs. Suzziette Jones' endorsed on the back of that check was not her signature and she did not receive any proceeds from the check. She also stated that she sent her niece to the post office in Pine Mountain for the check and the niece was told that 'a boy' had come and gotten it.
Larry Jones denied that he had signed either name endorsed on the check, or that he presented the check to the bank to be cashed. As rebuttal, the Pine Mountain Chief of Police testified that he prepared a photograph line-up consisting of five photographs, including one of Larry Jones, and that Cindy Kinsey (the bank teller) picked out Jones' photo as being the one who cashed the check.
Knowledge, like intent, is a question of fact which is seldom capable of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Pope v. State
...trier of fact could have found appellant guilty of forgery in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt. See Jones v. State, 141 Ga.App. 17, 232 S.E.2d 365 (1977). Compare Barron v. State, 12 Ga.App. 342(7), 77 S.E. 214 (1913), where the defendant's conviction for forgery was reversed beca......
-
Thomas v. State
...or criminal negligence. OCGA § 16-2-1. Since intent is a fact question seldom capable of proof by direct evidence (Jones v. State, 141 Ga.App. 17, 18, 232 S.E.2d 365 (1977)), it may be inferred and is manifested by circumstances connected with the perpetration of the offense. Mallette v. St......
-
Serrano v. State
...371, 219 S.E.2d 743; McCoy v. State, 237 Ga. 118, 119, 227 S.E.2d 18; Anderson v. State, 233 Ga. 464, 211 S.E.2d 754; Jones v. State, 141 Ga.App. 17, 18, 232 S.E.2d 365. 2. In enumeration of error no. 4, appellant argues that admissions made to a police officer were inadmissible because at ......
-
Keno v. Alside, Inc.
...evidence did not demand a verdict in the favor of appellants and there is evidence to support the verdict of the jury. Jones v. State, 141 Ga.App. 17, 18, 232 S.E.2d 365. Thus, the trial court did not err in denying a motion for new trial on the general 2. In addition to the general grounds......