Jones v. Toy
| Decision Date | 18 September 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 55010,55010 |
| Citation | 476 So.2d 30 |
| Parties | Robert Lee JONES v. Ted TOY and the City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi. |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
John L. Hunter, David O. McCormick, Cumbest, Cumbest & Hunter, Pascagoula, Johnny L. Williams, Watson & Williams, Hattiesburg, for appellant.
S. Wayne Easterling, Easterling & Varnado, Francis T. Zachary, Zachary & Zachary, Paul Richard Lambert, Hattiesburg, for appellees.
Before PATTERSON, C.J., and DAN M. LEE and ANDERSON, JJ.
Robert Lee Jones filed suit against Ted Toy and the City of Hattiesburg, hereinafter the City, in the Circuit Court of Forrest County, for injuries he received when thrown from a truck on which he was riding as a garbage collector for the City. The jury returned a verdict of $187,500.00 for Jones against Toy and the City. The trial court considered identical motions of Toy and the City for judgment, corrected judgment, or a new trial. The court granted a judgment non obstante veredicto as to the City and directed a remittitur of $125,000.00 within five (5) days or, alternatively, sustained the motion for new trial as to Toy. Jones appeals.
At the time of injury, Jones was a 19 year old laborer with a limited education. He was employed by the City to pick up garbage along the city streets and deposit it in the garbage truck. To perform this task it was necessary that Jones ride outside the truck on a rear platform or step provided for the employees. On each side of the truck there was secured a hand "hold" for the workers. John McNeil, a co-worker, performed the same duties as Jones on the opposite side of the truck.
While engaged in collecting garbage on the morning of the accident, Ted Toy, the truck driver, instructed Jones and McNeil to take the truck while he visited at the house of one Robertson and return for him in 20 to 30 minutes. The visits to Robertson's house appeared to be a practice of Toy's on three to five occasions each week. When Jones and McNeil returned to Robertson's house, Toy was angry. He indicated he would return the garbage truck to the city barn instead of continuing on the garbage collecting route. Toy, according to him, suggested that Jones and McNeil ride in the cab of the truck but because there was uncollected garbage on the street, both Jones and McNeil took their usual positions on the rear of the truck. Toy then accelerated at an unusual rate of speed and after traveling some two blocks struck a manhole cover in the street causing the truck to jolt throwing Jones onto the pavement. McNeil, who had climbed into the hopper of the truck, was bounced, according to him, 1 1/2 to 2 feet in the air and landed in the garbage bin despite the fact that he had been holding onto a cross piece above his head. Toy explained the accident by stating he had been looking in the rearview mirror, and had not seen the manhole cover in time to avoid hitting it.
Jones suffered a crushed right elbow and numerous abrasions to his head, leg and arms. He has a permanent loss of 90 percent use of his right arm. Additionally, osteoporosis and arthritis have developed because of the injury and Jones suffers from severe headaches since the accident.
The City did not have workmen's compensation for the benefit of its employees engaged in garbage collection. Therefore, common law remedies and defenses control the case. Governmental immunity will not bar the suit against the City as the collection of garbage is a private function rather than a governmental one. City of Pass Christian v. Fernandez, 100 Miss. 76, 56 So. 329 (1911).
Ordinarily, at common law, a master cannot be liable for the negligence of a fellow employee who was hired with due care. However, the master or employer may be charged with the employee's negligence and held liable for resulting injuries if the master knew or should have known of the fellow servant's incompetence. City of Meridian v. Hardy, 244 Miss. 372, 141 So.2d 566 (1962); Buckley v. United Gas Public Service Co., 176 Miss. 282, 168 So. 462 (1936).
Toy had been reprimanded by his supervisor, Mr. Donahoe, on previous occasions for driving too fast and had been threatened with losing his job if he did not slow down. Toy testified that some times he would comply with his superiors' directives and other times he would not. Toy had also been warned not to stop at Robertson's house but disregarded this directive as well.
Out of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lowery v. Statewide Healthcare Service, Inc.
...Rawlings v. Inglebritzen, 211 Miss. 760, 52 So.2d 630 (1951); I.C.R.R. v. Clark, 85 Miss. 691, 38 So. 97 (1905); see also Jones v. Toy, 476 So.2d 30, 31 (Miss.1985) (employer may be charged with employee's negligence (emphasis added)); Sugg v. Hendrix, 153 F.2d 240 (5th Cir.1946) ("[Mississ......
-
Connes v. Molalla Transport System, Inc.
...v. Prince George's County, 305 Md. 320, 503 A.2d 1333 (1986); Ponticas v. K.M.S. Investments, 331 N.W.2d 907 (Minn.1983); Jones v. Toy, 476 So.2d 30 (Miss.1985); Gaines v. Monsanto Co., 655 S.W.2d 568 (Mo.App.1983); F & T Co. v. Woods, 92 N.M. 697, 594 P.2d 745 (1979); Welsh Mfg. v. Pinkert......
-
L.T. ex rel. Hollins v. City of Jackson
...If the employer knew or should have known of the employee's propensity for misbehavior, then the employer may be liable. Jones v. Toy, 476 So.2d 30, 31 (Miss.1985). Once again, examining the evidence and record in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, this court is persuaded that Westwoo......
-
Starnes v. City of Vardaman, 90-CA-0017
...(Miss.1982), but we have consistently held the collection of garbage and trash a private or proprietary function. See Jones v. Toy, 476 So.2d 30, 31 (Miss.1985); City of Pass Christian v. Fernandez, 100 Miss. 76, 82, 56 So. 329 (1911). The Jones case seems particularly relevant. Plaintiff w......