Jones v. Wainwright
| Decision Date | 20 December 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. 457P00.,457P00. |
| Citation | 546 S.E.2d 102,353 N.C. 265 |
| Parties | Reese Ann JONES v. Bruce Vedder WAINWRIGHT and Michael Wainwright. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
E. Gregory Stott, Raleigh, for Jones.
Jonathan E. Hall, Raleigh, for Wainwrights.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th day of December 2000."
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
Oakwood Acceptance Corp., LLC v. Massengill
...v. Trustees of Durham Tech. Cmty. Coll., 139 N.C.App. 676, 681, 535 S.E.2d 357, 361, app. dismissed and disc. review denied, 353 N.C. 265, 546 S.E.2d 102 (2000) (citations omitted). The non-movant may not "rest upon the allegations of its pleading to create an issue of fact, even though the......
-
Johnson v. Board of Trustees of Durham Technical Community College
...of Durham Tech. Cmty. Coll., 139 N.C.App. 676, 535 S.E.2d 357 ("Johnson I"), disc. review denied and appeal dismissed, 353 N.C. 265, 546 S.E.2d 102 (2000). Plaintiff amended her complaint to add a claim under the NCPDPA alleging defendant failed to re-hire her on the basis of her disability......
-
Salter v. E & J HEALTHCARE, INC.
...Tech. Cmty. Coll., 139 N.C.App. 676, 680-81, 535 S.E.2d 357, 361 (citations omitted), appeal dismissed, disc. review denied, 353 N.C. 265, 546 S.E.2d 102 (2000). Prior to addressing plaintiff's causes of action, there is an initial point of contention between the parties as to whether plain......
-
Venable v. Vernon, COA03-230.
...Johnson v. Trustees of Durham Tech. Cmty. Coll., 139 N.C.App. 676, 681, 535 S.E.2d 357, 361,disc. review denied, 353 N.C. 265, 546 S.E.2d 102 (2000)). In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must prove that an "essential element of the opposing party's claim i......
Request a trial to view additional results