K.C.B. v. State, 97-1741

Decision Date12 August 1998
Docket NumberNo. 97-1741,97-1741
Citation715 So.2d 1083
Parties23 Fla. L. Weekly D1874 K.C.B., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Dominique T. Suite-Brown, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, who was being chased by police, ran to an apartment for which he had no key. After knocking on the door, he was admitted into the apartment. Immediately thereafter, police officers entered and found the juvenile sitting in the apartment. Near the juvenile, police officers found a bag of cocaine on a table and some syringes behind a dresser. The juvenile was convicted of possession of cocaine.

Because the juvenile was not in actual possession of the cocaine, the State had to show he had "constructive possession." The State had the burden to prove the juvenile 1) had dominion and control over the cocaine; 2) had knowledge that the cocaine was within his presence; and 3) had knowledge of the illicit nature of the cocaine. See Brown v. State, 428 So.2d 250, 252 (Fla.1983).

Where, as here, the juvenile does not own or occupy the premises, dominion and control can not be inferred, but must be established by independent evidence. See Id. The State failed to present independent evidence to establish that the juvenile had the ability to exercise dominion and control over the cocaine. Johnson v. State, 456 So.2d 923, 925 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). The evidence establishes nothing more than mere presence, which is insufficient to establish that the juvenile was in constructive possession of the cocaine.

Reversed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Midgette v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 Diciembre 2014
    ...not permitted though defendant watched roommate install stolen air conditioner in their shared apartment); see also K.C.B. v. State, 715 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (holding defendant did not possess cocaine where merely sitting near cocaine in another's apartment); cf. Holcomb v. State, ......
  • Waldron v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 25 Abril 2008
    ...conviction for grand theft of a Chevrolet that was being pushed by a Mazda driven by defendant); see also K.C.B. v. State, 715 So.2d 1083, 1083-84 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (finding insufficient evidence to support dominion and control element of constructive possession of contraband found in an a......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT