K.S. v. State, 96-2917
| Decision Date | 13 August 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. 96-2917,96-2917 |
| Citation | 697 So.2d 1275 |
| Parties | 22 Fla. L. Weekly D1925 K.S., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Tracy L. Kramer, Special Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Douglas Gurnic, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and GODERICH, JJ.
This is yet another case where an individual's loud, obscene, verbal protests of police conduct result in a conviction, or adjudication of delinquency, for disorderly conduct and/or resisting arrest without violence. We reverse.
The testimony below established that a police officer was investigating a purse-snatching in the swimming pool area of an apartment complex. Between ten and fifteen people, including K.S. and his friends, were at the pool when the robbery occurred. Responding to what he obviously felt was an unjustified accusation by the officer, K.S. said
At that point, the people at the pool gathered in the vicinity of the officer's car. Some, including K.S.'s cousin, were telling the officer that K.S. "didn't do anything" and that he should "let him go." K.S. again said "fuck this" and began to walk away from the officer. The officer then decided to arrest K.S. for disorderly conduct, grabbed him by the belt, and placed him in his police car.
This case is factually similar to, and legally indistinguishable from, L.A.T. v. State, 650 So.2d 214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). There, the juvenile specifically "called upon passers-by to witness and protest the arrest of his friend...." He did so by screaming, "is everybody watching this ... police brutality ... Rodney King style." The officers testified that twenty to twenty-five people had gathered around while L.A.T. was screaming.
On appeal this court reversed L.A.T.'s adjudication of delinquency for disorderly conduct.
The record shows that while a number of persons gathered at the scene and observed the goings on, L.A.T.'s words neither themselves urged the crowd to respond nor actually had that effect. Specifically, they did not "disturb" or cause anybody to interfere with the arrest or otherwise to breach the peace.3
K.S.'s words in this case are even less egregious than L.A.T.'s in the sense that they were not directed at the crowd but were instead a coarse expression of frustration at what K.S. perceived was an unjust accusation. They clearly did not "by their...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gold v. City of Miami
...after the date of Gold's arrest confirm that Gold's arrest was contrary to clearly established Florida law. See K.S. v. State, 697 So.2d 1275, 1276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (reversing disorderly conduct conviction where defendant's loud protests of police conduct "were not directed at the crowd b......
-
C.W. v. State
...more, is insufficient to support a charge of disorderly conduct. See Fields v. State, 24 So.3d 646 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); K.S. v. State, 697 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). The record facts in C.W.'s case do not support a finding of disorderly conduct or obstruction of a legal duty. “If an arre......
-
Barry v. State, 2D05-2667.
...because there was no evidence that the defendant's words were anything other than an annoyance to those around them); K.S. v. State, 697 So.2d 1275, 1276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (reversing adjudication for disorderly conduct even though a crowd gathered to watch the goings-on because the crowd d......
-
JGD v. State, 98-1695
...cognizable wrongdoing on the part of the juvenile, either by his words, H.K. v. State, 711 So.2d 173 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); K.S. v. State, 697 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); L.A.T. v. State, 650 So.2d 214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); S.D. v. State, 627 So.2d 1261 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), or, as shown by the......