Kaney v. Newyork State Civil Serv. Comm'n

Citation83 N.E.2d 11,298 N.Y. 707
PartiesJames J. KANEY et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK STATE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION et al.
Decision Date24 November 1948
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, 273 App.Div. 1054, 81 N.Y.S.2d 168.

Proceeding in the matter of the application of James J. Kaney and others, under Article 78, section 1283 et seq., of the Civil Practice Act, against the New York State Civil Service Commission and others, for an order prohibiting the respondents from cancelling the examination taken by petitioners and the eligible list upon which petitioners were placed, and the appointment of the petitioners to position of fire fighter of the Fire Department of the City of Lackawanna.

It was alleged by the petitioners that they were placed on the eligible list established by the Lackawanna Civil Service Commission as the result of examination. It appeared further from the petition that a preliminary investigation was conducted by the State Civil Service Commission and that as a result thereof the State Civil Service Commission decided to prefer charges against the Lackawanna Municipal Civil Service Commission and to seek a rescission of the examination and the eligible list, and the cancellation of all appointments made therefrom.

The petitioners challenged the proceedings pending before the State Civil Service Commission upon the ground that the State Commission had ‘prejudged’ the case and had determined to rescind the examination and to cancel appointments regardless of proof upon hearing; that the Civil Service Law, Consol.Laws, c. 7, s 11, subd. 7, under which the State Commission instituted the proceeding was unconstitutional; and that the proceeding was invalid because they had not been given any notice of the hearing and had not been made parties to the proceeding. More specifically, the attack was based upon the grounds that the statute invaded the home rule provisions of the Const. art. 9, s 12, and that it was an improper delegation of legislative power to an administrative agency. The Attorney General did not answer the petition, but interposed a notice of motion asking dismissal of the petition upon the ground that it was insufficient in law on its face.

Order of the Special Term, 190 Misc. 944, 77 N.Y.S.2d 8, denying the application and dismissing the petition and amended petition, was affirmed by the Appellate Division, 273 App.Div. 1054, 81 N.Y.S.2d 168, and the petitioners appeal....

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • Dondi v. Jones
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 3, 1976
    ...York State Civ. Serv. Comm., 190 Misc. 944, 951, 77 N.Y.S.2d 8, 16 (Halpern, J.), affd. 273 App.Div. 1054, 81 N.Y.S.2d 168, affd. 298 N.Y. 707, 83 N.E.2d 11; 23 Carmody-Wait 2d, N.Y.Prac., § 145:215, p. 788; see Comment: The Writ of Prohibition in New York--Attempt to Circumscribe an Elusiv......
  • Nicholson v. State Commission on Judicial Conduct
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • July 1, 1980
    ...Matter of Kaney v. New York State Civ. Serv. Comm., 190 Misc. 944, 77 N.Y.S.2d 8, affd. 273 App.Div. 1054, 81 N.Y.S.2d 168, affd. 298 N.Y. 707, 83 N.E.2d 11; Note, Writ of Prohibition in New York-Attempt to Circumscribe an Elusive Concept, 50 St. John's L.Rev. 76, 84). Even when the petitio......
  • Komyathy v. Board of Ed. of Wappinger Central School Dist. No. 1
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • June 20, 1973
    ...Kaney v. State Civil Service Comm., 190 Misc. 944, 947--948, 77 N.Y.S.2d 8, 13, affd., 273 App.Div. 1054, 81 N.Y.S.2d 168, affd., 298 N.Y. 707, 83 N.E.2d 11). In a very recent decision by my brother, Judge Lee P. Gagliardi, the federal district court refused to enjoin the Poughkeepsie City ......
  • City of Salamanca v. City of Salamanca Police Unit of Cattaraugus County, Local No. 805, CSEA/AFSCME
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • January 15, 1986
    ...See Kaney v. New York State Civil Service Commission, 190 Misc. 944, 77 N.Y.S.2d 8 aff'd. 273 A.D. 1054, 81 N.Y.S.2d 168 aff'd. 298 N.Y. 707, 83 N.E.2d 11. Motion that the decision of the arbitrator be vacated and set aside is Cross-motion that the award of the arbitrator be confirmed is de......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT