Karagan v. Bryant for Greger
Decision Date | 02 October 1987 |
Citation | 516 So.2d 599 |
Parties | Phillip P. KARAGAN v. Thomas E. BRYANT, Jr., as guardian for Vincent J. GREGER, incompetent. 85-1327. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Phillip P. Karagan, pro se.
Thomas E. Harrison, Mobile, for appellee.
This is a suit brought under Code 1975, § 40-10-83, for redemption of land purchased at a tax sale. The trial court allowed the redemption. The purchaser, Phillip P. Karagan, argues that the plaintiff was not in possession and so was not entitled to bring an action under § 40-10-83.
Vincent J. Greger bought the house and lot at 1280 East Carlton Acres some time prior to 1956. He failed to pay his taxes for 1981, and the state purchased the property at a tax sale on June 8, 1982. See Code 1975, § 40-10-18. On April 12, 1985, the state conveyed its interest to Phillip P. Karagan. Karagan testified that he viewed the property prior to purchasing it and again on two other occasions in 1985, and saw no sign that the property was inhabited. Photographs he took in January 1986 showed the yard overgrown, some of the windows broken out, the back door missing, and the house generally appearing to be uninhabited. Interior shots show trash and broken furniture strewn about and no signs of habitation.
Karagan began repairs on January 17, 1986. He replaced the back door, placed locks on the doors, replaced windows, threw out trash, painted the house, and cut the yard. On February 26, 1986, the probate court granted Thomas E. Bryant, Jr., letters of guardianship over "Vincent J. Greger, Unsound Mind." On April 7, 1986, Bryant, as Greger's guardian, filed this action against Karagan.
The evidence tended to show that Greger lived in the house until December 1985, when he was found in his house with acid burns on his back. His neighbors called for an ambulance, and he was taken to a hospital and from there to a nursing home. Greger was diagnosed as having Alzheimer's disease. Martin Davis, who lived down the street from Greger and had known him since 1945, testified that Greger had lived in the house in question continuously until December 1985. When Karagan asked him how he knew Greger had lived in the house, Davis answered:
Greger's wife, from whom he had been separated since 1971, also testified that he lived in the house until December 1985 and that she had visited him there regularly.
Bryant brought this action under Code 1975, § 40-10-83: 1
This Code section traces to the 1907 Code, with the only material change being the reduction of the interest rate from 25%. Code 1907, § 2312; Code 1923, § 3108; Code 1940, t. 51, § 296.
Although the Code section itself speaks only in terms of the original owner raising redemption as a defensive matter in an action brought by the tax purchaser, this Court has held that an owner in possession need not wait to be sued, but may bring an original bill to quiet title. Burdett v. Rossiter, 220 Ala. 631, 127 So. 202 (1930); Georgia Loan & Trust Co. v. Washington Realty Co., 205 Ala. 288, 87 So. 794 (1921). The Court also held very early that the statute of limitations applicable to otherwise-authorized suits for redemption, see Code 1975, § 40-10-120, did not apply to claims for redemption under this Code section. Burdett, supra; Green v. Stephens, 198 Ala. 325, 73 So. 532 (1916). It was also held that a scrambling possession was sufficient to entitle the original owner to take advantage of the redemption provisions of this section. Bell v. Propst, 220 Ala. 641, 127 So. 212 (1930). See also Alabama Pecan Development Co. v. Case, 266 Ala. 471, 97 So.2d 537 (1957).
These interpretations of the predecessors of § 40-10-83 have been applied to the present day. The conclusion that the statute of limitations does not apply has led to the further conclusion that no limitation applies; except, in Edmonson v. Colwell, 504 So.2d 235 (Ala.1987), we held that the rule of repose may bar a claim of redemption made more than 20 years after the tax sale. See also Giardina v. Williams, 512 So.2d 1312 (Ala.1987).
Gulf Land Co. v. Buzzelli, 501 So.2d 1211 (Ala.1987), presented a situation similar in pertinent respects to this case. The property in that case was purchased by the state at a tax sale in 1980; in September 1984, the state sold the property to Johnson, who resold it later that month to Gulf Land Company. At that time, Buzzelli could claim only the constructive possession that follows record title. See Giardina, supra. This Court in Gulf Land Co. concluded as follows:
This Court has referred to § 40-10-82, which terminates the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Austill v. Prescott
...this case is clear."(Emphasis original.) In support of his argument, Prescott cited, among other cases, Reese; Buzzelli; Karagan v. Bryant, 516 So. 2d 599 (Ala. 1987) ; and Hand v. Stanard, 392 So. 2d 1157 (Ala. 1980).Austill filed a response to Prescott's renewed motion to dismiss, in whic......
-
State Dept. of Revenue v. Price-Williams
...an owner in possession to seek redemption by bringing a bill to quiet title, as the Price-Williamses did here. See Karagan v. Bryant, 516 So.2d 599 (Ala.1987) (owner in possession does not have to wait to be sued, but may bring an original bill to quiet In 1946, in Moorer v. Chastang, 247 A......
-
McGuire v. Rogers
...under § 40-10-83 without regard to possession by the redemptioner. Reese v. Robinson, 523 So.2d 398 (Ala.1988). See also Karagan v. Bryant, 516 So.2d 599 (Ala.1987). It is undisputed that the defendants had not maintained adverse possession of the tax-sale property for three years before Ro......
-
Daugherty v. Rester
...247 Ala. 676, 26 So.2d 75 (1946); Tensaw Land & Timber Co. v. Rivers, 244 Ala. 657, 15 So.2d 411 (1943); see also Karagan v. Bryant, 516 So.2d 599, 600-01 (Ala.1987) (noting that the rule of repose may bar a claim of redemption made more than 20 years after the tax sale). We have long held ......