Karnes v. Wilkinson Mfg. Co.

Citation220 Neb. 150,368 N.W.2d 788
Decision Date07 June 1985
Docket NumberNo. 83-914,83-914
PartiesDonna KARNES, Tax Commissioner of the State of Nebraska, Appellant, v. WILKINSON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Nebraska Corporation, et al., Appellees.
CourtNebraska Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court

1. Jurisdiction: Appeal and Error. The right of appeal is statutory and the requirements of a particular statute are mandatory and must be complied with before the appellate court acquires jurisdiction of the subject matter of an action.

2. Taxation: Public Officers and Employees: Appeal and Error. The Tax Commissioner is not a "person aggrieved" and therefore does not have the right to appeal a decision of the State Board of Equalization and Assessment, as provided by Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 77-27, 127 and 84-917 (Reissue 1981).

Paul L. Douglas, Atty. Gen., and Ralph H. Gillan, Lincoln, for appellant.

Paul S. Dye and Sharon R. Kresha of Baird, Holm, McEachen, Pedersen, Hamann & Strasheim, Omaha, for appellee Wilkinson Mfg.

KRIVOSHA, C.J., and BOSLAUGH, WHITE, HASTINGS, SHANAHAN, and GRANT, JJ.

WHITE, Justice.

The plaintiff, Donna Karnes, Tax Commissioner of the State of Nebraska, appeals from an order of the district court for Lancaster County, Nebraska, denying the plaintiff standing to appeal a decision of the State Board of Equalization and Assessment.

The defendant, Wilkinson Manufacturing Company, is a primary contractor with the U.S. Department of Defense. Under the terms of Wilkinson's contracts with the United States, the machinery and tooling acquired to manufacture the contracted-for items are owned by the United States. At the termination of the contracts the items remain the property of the United States.

The Nebraska Department of Revenue issued a notice of deficiency determination imposing use tax on the above-described items of machinery and tooling. Wilkinson paid the tax and filed a claim for refund with the Department of Revenue. Following a hearing, the Tax Commissioner denied Wilkinson's claim for refund and upheld the deficiency assessment, penalty, and interest. Wilkinson Manufacturing appealed the Tax Commissioner's decision to the state board. Following a hearing before the state board, on which the Tax Commissioner sat as a member, the board reversed the Tax Commissioner's decision and ordered that the tax, penalty, and interest be refunded to Wilkinson Manufacturing.

The plaintiff appealed the decision of the state board to the Lancaster County District Court. The district court dismissed the action on the ground that the Tax Commissioner did not have standing to appeal the decision of the state board. The question is simply whether the Legislature has given the Tax Commissioner the right of appeal from the decisions of the board of which she is a member. We agree with the district court that the Legislature has not given her that right.

It is a well-recognized rule that the right of appeal is statutory and the requirements of a particular statute are mandatory and must be complied with before the appellate court acquires jurisdiction of the subject matter of an action. Whitehouse Energy Savers v. Hanlon, 214 Neb. 572, 334 N.W.2d 802 (1983). The applicable statutes do not give the Tax Commissioner the right to appeal from a final decision of the state board.

Neb.Rev.Stat. § 77-27,127 (Reissue 1981) describes the appeal procedure from the state board and states:

Any final decision of the State Board of Equalization and Assessment shall be subject to judicial review as provided in sections 84-917 to 84-919. Any final action of the Tax Commissioner, if the person aggrieved thereby elects not to appeal first to the State Board of Equalization and Assessment, shall be subject to judicial review as provided in sections 84-917 to 84-919, as though it were a final...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Stoneman v. United Nebraska Bank
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • April 17, 1998
    ...201 Neb. 769, 272 N.W.2d 268 (1978), and whether the appellee minority shareholders were "aggrieved," see Karnes v. Wilkinson Mfg., 220 Neb. 150, 368 N.W.2d 788 (1985). "Any person aggrieved by a final decision in a contested case, whether such decision is affirmative or negative in form, s......
  • Cross v. North Platte Natural Res. Dist.
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • August 27, 2010
    ...Dist., 270 Neb. 494, 704 N.W.2d 237 (2005); Stoneman v. United Neb. Bank, 254 Neb. 477, 577 N.W.2d 271 (1998); Karnes v. Wilkinson Mfg., 220 Neb. 150, 368 N.W.2d 788 (1985). 13In re Application of Metropolitan Util. Dist., supra note 12. 14Id. 15Id. 16Metropolitan Utilities Dist. v. Twin Pl......
  • State v. Jacobitz, No. A-06-824 (Neb. App. 2/27/2007)
    • United States
    • Nebraska Court of Appeals
    • February 27, 2007
    ...and must be complied with before the appellate court acquires jurisdiction of the subject matter of an action. Karnes v. Wilkinson Mfg., 220 Neb. 150, 368 N.W.2d 788 (1985). Further, statutes which are in derogation of the common-law traditions of criminal procedure are to be strictly const......
  • McClellan v. Board of Equalization
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • May 2, 2008
    ...supra note 9. See, also, Neb. Const art I, § 23 (limiting right to appeal to aggrieved "party"). 11. See, e.g., Karnes v. Wilkinson Mfg., 220 Neb. 150, 368 N.W.2d 788 (1985). 12. See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 77-1510 (Cum.Supp. 2006). 13. Comp. Stat. § 5045 (1903), later § 77-1510 (1943). 14. See Neb......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT