Kautman v. Mar-Mac Community School Dist., MAR-MAC
Decision Date | 29 June 1977 |
Docket Number | MAR-MAC,No. 2-58583,2-58583 |
Parties | Sara KAUTMAN, by her next friend, Donald Kautman, and Donald Kautman, Appellants, v.COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT and Richard Kelm, Appellees. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
R. L. Donohue, West Union, for appellants.
James E. Thomson of Jacobson, Bristol & Thomson, Waukon, for appellees.
Submitted to MOORE, C. J., and MASON, RAWLINGS, REES and McCORMICK, JJ.
Action by Sara Kautman, by her next friend Donald Kautman, stems from a January 8, 1973, school bus accident which occurred when Sara and other members of the Mar-Mac seventh grade basketball team were returning home from a game.
Trial jury awarded plaintiff $25,000. Upon return of the verdict she unsuccessfully moved for a new trial unless defendants consent to additur in such amount as may be allowed by trial court. This points up the issues here raised by plaintiff, but an affirmance as to denial of her right to a new trial obviates any need to consider additur.
I. Our review is on errors assigned. Iowa R.Civ.P. 334.
Moore v. Bailey, 163 N.W.2d 435, 436 (Iowa 1968).
See also Dubuque Area Chamber of Commerce v. Adams, 225 N.W.2d 147, 149 (Iowa 1975).
Furthermore,
Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc., 170 N.W.2d 632, 659 (Iowa 1969).
See also Giltner v. Stark, 219 N.W.2d 700, 709 (Iowa 1974); Osterfoss v. Illinois Central Railroad, 215 N.W.2d 233, 236 (Iowa 1974).
Added to the foregoing is this apt observation in Mazur v. Grantham, 255 Iowa 1292, 1303, 125 N.W.2d 807, 814 (1964):
See also Lappe v. Blocker, 220 N.W.2d 570, 572-573 (Iowa 1974); Turner v. Jones, 215 N.W.2d 289, 292 (Iowa 1974).
We must also accord weight to the fact trial court, aided by seeing and hearing the witnesses, observing the jury and having before it all incidents of the trial, did not deem it appropriate to interfere. Olsen v. Drahos, 229 N.W.2d 741, 743 (Iowa 1975).
II. Turning to the record, it is apparent all doctors agreed upon the nature and permanency of plaintiff's injuries. There were diverse opinions, however, as to the severity thereof. An understanding of these variances compels a comparison of relevant testimony by plaintiff's witness, Dr. Walker, with that of Dr. Phillips, a defense-called witness.
Dr. Walker testified the intervertebral disc spaces between plaintiff's injured vertebrae have been "pretty well destroyed". Conversely, Dr. Phillips found these disc spaces "normal" and "well maintained".
Similarly, Dr. Walker said traumatic arthritis already existed. But Dr. Phillips found no present traumatic arthritis in plaintiff's neck or back.
Then too, Dr. Walker evaluated plaintiff's present functional disability at 20% of the body. He was of the belief Sara would require more extensive medical treatment, including surgery to fuse the cervical discs injured in the accident. This operation, which Dr. Walker thought necessary in 10-15 years, would cost about $2000 at present rates. On the other hand, Dr. Phillips found no existing functional disability...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Shepard v. Wapello County, Iowa
...portions of the conflicting evidence it chose, the verdict effects substantial justice between the parties. Kautman v. Mar-Mac Comm. School Dist., 255 N.W.2d 146, 147-48 (Iowa 1977) (quoting in part Mazur v. Grantham, 255 Iowa 1292, 1303, 125 N.W.2d 807, 814 (1964)); see Penney v. Praxair, ......
-
Madison v. Ibp, Inc.
...is the result of passion, prejudice or other ulterior motives; or (4) is lacking in evidential support." Kautman v. Mar-Mac Community Sch. Dist., 255 N.W.2d 146, 147-48 (Iowa 1977) (internal citations omitted); see Cowan v. Flannery, 461 N.W.2d 155, 157-58 (Iowa 1990); Jackson v. Roger, 507......
-
Jasper v. H. Nizam, Inc.
...question, and courts should not interfere with an award when it is within a reasonable range of the evidence. Kautman v. Mar-Mac Cmty. Sch. Dist., 255 N.W.2d 146, 147 (Iowa 1977). At the outset, we recognize Kid University does not claim the evidence in this case failed to support an award ......
-
Kohrt v. Midamerican Energy Co., Civil Action No. 3-00-CV-10090 (S.D. Iowa 8/30/2002)
...portions of the conflicting evidence it chose, the verdict effects substantial justice between the parties. Kautman v. Mar-Mac Comm. Sch. Dist., 255 N.W.2d 146, 147-48 (Iowa 1977); see Penney v. Praxair, Inc., 116 F.3d 330, 333 (8th Cir. 1997) (applying Iowa law); Johnson v. Knoxville Comm.......