Keene Corp. v. Sheppard

Citation503 A.2d 192
PartiesKEENE CORPORATION, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. Deronda SHEPPARD and Geraldine Sheppard, his wife, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees. . Submitted:
Decision Date17 December 1985
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Delaware

Upon appeal from Superior Court. Affirmed.

Richard P.S. Hannum (argued) and Beth E. Evans of Prickett, Jones, Elliott, Kristol & Schnee, Wilmington, and Somers S. Price of Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, for appellant.

Douglas B. Canfield (argued) of Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Wilmington, for appellees.

Before CHRISTIE, C.J., McNEILLY, HORSEY and MOORE, JJ., constituting the Court en banc. *

PER CURIAM:

The facts of this case were fully set forth in Judge Poppiti's opinion in Sheppard v. A.C. & S. Co., Del.Super., 498 A.2d 1126 (1985). In that opinion, the trial court treated all of the pertinent issues. We are of the opinion that each issue then before the Court was correctly decided by the Superior Court. The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

* Justice Walsh, having made rulings applicable to all then pending asbestos cases as a Judge of Superior Court, took no part in this decision.

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Matter of Celotex Corp.
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Eleventh Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Middle District of Florida
    • 15 Noviembre 1994
    ...856, 859 (N.Y.Sup.1989); Larson, 399 N.W.2d at 6; Sheppard v. A.C. & S. Co., 498 A.2d 1126, 1129-30 (Del.Super.Ct.1985); Keene Corp. v. Sheppard, 503 A.2d 192 (Del.1986); Devlin v. Johns-Manville Corp., 202 N.J.Super. 556, 495 A.2d 495, 501 (N.J.Super.Ct.Law Div.1985); Fearson v. Johns-Manv......
  • Potts v. Celotex Corp.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Tennessee
    • 10 Septiembre 1990
    ...it does affect lung-function. Sheppard v. A.C. & S. Co., 498 A.2d 1126, 1128, n. 3 (Del.Super.Ct.1985), aff'd sub nom., Keene Corp. v. Sheppard, 503 A.2d 192 (Del.1986).3 This label is not found in Tennessee cases, which formulate the rule instead as a negative--that "[a] plaintiff cannot b......
  • Pecorino v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • 29 Diciembre 1988
    ...Court of Michigan] 1987); Sheppard v. A.C. & S. Co., 498 A.2d 1126 ( [Superior Court of Delaware], 1985) adopted in full Keene Corp. v. Sheppard, 503 A.2d 192 ( [Supreme Court of Delaware], 1986); Devlin v. Johns-Manville Corp., 202 N.J.Super. 556, 495 A.2d 495 ( [Superior Court of New Jers......
  • DiMedio v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Delaware
    • 15 Diciembre 1986
    ...aff'd, 486 A.2d 1150 (Del. 1984)). The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed this refinement of the discovery rule. See Keene Corp. v. Sheppard, 503 A.2d 192 (Del.1986); see also Nutt v. A.C. & S. Co., C.A. No. 80-C-FE-8, slip op. (Del.Super.Ct. July 19, 1984) (discussing the information that mus......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT