Kelly v. Bank of Buffalo
| Decision Date | 19 June 1969 |
| Citation | 32 A.D.2d 875,302 N.Y.S.2d 60 |
| Parties | James J. KELLY, Appellant, v. BANK OF BUFFALO, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Desmond & Drury, Edward J. Desmond, Buffalo, for appellant.
Saperston, Wiltse, Duke, Day & Wilson, Herbert J. Lustig, Buffalo, for respondent.
Before DEL VECCHIO, J.P., and WITMER, GABRIELLI, BASTOW, and HENRY, JJ.
The motion to dismiss this complaint was made pursuant to CPLR 3211(a), par. 7, upon the ground that it failed to state a cause of action. Although the court might have treated the motion as one for summary judgment (CPLR 3211(c)), there is nothing in the record to indicate that the court did in fact choose to treat it as such. On the contrary, both the order appealed from and the decision of the court state that the complaint is dismissed for failure to state a cause of action and the notice of appeal describes the appeal as taken 'from an order dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action against the defendant'. We recognize, however, that on such a motion the court is no longer limited to a consideration of the pleading itself but may consider extrinsic matter submitted by the parties in disposing of the motion. (4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y.Civ.Prac., par. 3211.43; Hamilton Printing Co., Inc. v. Ernest Payne Corporation, 26 A.D.2d 876, 273 N.Y.S.2d 929.) The inquiry is whether the pleader has a cause of action rather than whether he has properly stated one. (6 Carmody-Wait 2d, New York Practice, Section 38:19.) Tested by this standard, we think it was error to dismiss the complaint. Factual issues were presented by the affidavits and other evidence submitted by the parties on the motion which precluded a determination before trial that defendant had fully performed the contract sued on by plaintiff. Among others, one of the critical issues was the amount which defendant would have received if the property had been sold under the original contract executed by plaintiff. At this stage of the litigation defendant was not entitled to a dismissal of the complaint, nor would it have been entitled to summary judgment if the motion had been regarded as a request for that relief. (1136 Tenants' Corporation v. Max Rothenberg & Company, 27 A.D.2d 830, 277 N.Y.S.2d 996, aff'd 21 N.Y.2d 995, 290 N.Y.S.2d 919, 238 N.E.2d 322; Falk v. Goodman, 7 N.Y.2d 87, 91, 195 N.Y.S.2d 645, 647, 163 N.E.2d 871, 873.)
Order unanimously reversed with costs and...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Division of Triple T Service, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
...Code. 'The inquiry is whether the pleader has a cause of action rather than whether he has properly stated one' (Kelly v. Bank of Buffalo, 32 A.D.2d 875, 302 N.Y.S.2d 60). Before discussing the merits it should be noted that the relief requested by plaintiff (a temporary and eventually a pe......
-
Reger v. National Ass'n of Bedding Mfrs. Group Ins. Trust Fund
...509--510). The inquiry is limited to whether the pleader Has a cause of action rather than whether one is stated (Kelly v. Bank of Buffalo, 32 A.D.2d 875, 302 N.Y.S.2d 60). The statutes of this state require the employer and insurer of any group life policy that may be 'deliver(ed) in this ......
-
Fletcher v. Greiner
...or otherwise, to ascertain whether it discloses a real issue rather than a formal, perfunctory or shadowy one (James J. Kelly v. Bank of Buffalo, 32 A.D.2d 875, 302 N.Y.S.2d 60). The Court has reviewed the affidavits and memoranda of law submitted by the parties herein. These papers reveal ......
-
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Town of Huntington
...a cause of action but whether a cause of action exists (Southworth v. State, 82 Misc.2d 400, 369 N.Y.S.2d 980; see Kelly v. Bank of Buffalo, 32 A.D.2d 875, 302 N.Y.S.2d 60). The certificate of the municipal attorney is presumptive evidence that proper proceedings have been had or taken for ......