Kelly v. White

Decision Date16 March 2020
Docket NumberNo. 19-264,R46-012 / OT 2019,19-264
CitationKelly v. White, 140 S.Ct. 993(Mem), 206 L.Ed.2d 389(Mem) (2020)
Parties KELLY, Supt., OR v. Lydell M. WHITE.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed on March 16, 2020, pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • State v. Link
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • March 4, 2021
    ...Id. at 24, 417 P.3d 401.In White v. Premo , 365 Or. 1, 12-15, 443 P.3d 597 (2019), cert. dismissed sub nom Kelly v. White , ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 993, 206 L.Ed.2d 389 (2020), this court held that Miller ’s individualized-sentencing requirement applies to a term-of-years sentence that is......
  • Hardegger v. Amsberry
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • August 12, 2020
    ...to be appropriate. See White v. Premo , 365 Or. 1, 11, 443 P.3d 597 (2019), cert. dismissed sub nom, Kelly v. White , ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 993, 206 L. Ed. 2d 389 (2020) (a petitioner could not have reasonably asserted a claim under Miller before the decision, because the United States ......
  • Canales-Robles v. Laney
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • September 9, 2021
    ...petition were reasonably available to him. See White v. Premo , 365 Or. 1, 6, 443 P.3d 597 (2019), cert. dismissed , ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 993, 206 L. Ed.2d 389 (2020) ("[A]s used in the escape clauses ***, the term ‘grounds’ means the legal rule asserted as a basis for a claim, not the......
  • Harned v. Amsberry
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • October 13, 2021
    ...may be sentenced to life without parole." White v. Premo , 365 Or. 1, 17, 443 P.3d 597 (2019), cert. dismissed , ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 993, 206 L.Ed.2d 389 (2020). Accordingly, the Oregon Supreme Court explained in White that "the fact that the trial court considered a juvenile's age in......
  • Get Started for Free