Kemmerlin v. Wingate
| Decision Date | 17 December 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 21097,21097 |
| Citation | 261 S.E.2d 50,274 S.C. 62 |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Thomas KEMMERLIN, Jr., as Trustee for O'Neal Plumbing Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Jack O. WINGATE, Jack Peterson Wilson, Wingate and Peterson, CPA's, Jack O. Wingate, CPA and Wingate and Elmore, CPA's, Respondents. |
David P. Cole, of Arnold, Iseman & Cole, Columbia, for appellant.
Donald V. Richardson and Charles E. Carpenter, Jr. of Richardson, Plowden, Grier & Howser, Columbia, for respondents.
An involuntary nonsuit was rendered against appellant O'Neal Plumbing Company Inc., in an accountants' malpractice action charging negligent performance by respondent Wingate. We affirm.
In the early 1960's, O'Neal employed Wingate to perform certain accounting services. Wingate and his successors, through their agents, servants and employees, prepared the corporation's financial statements and tax returns through the 1973 tax year. The appellant corporation went into bankruptcy in 1976.
O'Neal instituted this action alleging respondents had performed their services so negligently as to cause substantial loss to the corporation and its shareholders. A subsequent motion to amend the complaint to assert an additional cause of action for breach of warranty was denied. At the end of appellant's case, the trial court granted respondents' motion for an involuntary nonsuit on several grounds including appellant's failure to show either the standard of care applicable to professional accountants or any damages proximately caused by respondents' acts or omissions.
Appellant first excepts to the trial court's denial of his motion to amend the complaint. Amendments to pleadings after the expiration of the period provided in § 15-13-910, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976), are within the sound discretion of the trial court. S. C. State Highway Dept. v. Rural Land Co., Inc., 250 S.C. 12, 156 S.E.2d 333 (1967); Morgan v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 261 F.Supp. 709 (D.S.C.1966). We find no abuse here.
Appellant next asserts the trial court erred in granting respondents' motion for an involuntary nonsuit. We disagree.
The burden of proof of the requisite standard of care and the causal relationship between the defendant's negligence and the plaintiff's injuries is upon the plaintiff in a professional negligence action. Steeves v. U. S., 294 F.Supp. 446 (D.S.C.1968); Armstrong v. Weiland, 267 S.C. 12, 225 S.E.2d 851 (1976). The standard of care applicable to accountants is "the same as those applied to . . . , doctors, . . . and other professional men . . . furnishing skilled services for compensation," and that standard requires reasonable care and competence therein. Gammel v. Ernst & Ernst, 245 Minn. 249, 72 N.W.2d 364, 367, 54 A.L.R.2d 316, 321 (1955). Reasonable care and competence in this context means "that they will render their services with that degree of skill, care, knowledge, and judgment usually possessed and exercised by members of that profession in the particular locality, in accordance with accepted...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hook v. Rothstein
... ... knowledge, expert testimony will usually be necessary to establish both the standard of care and the defendant's departure therefrom." Kemmerlin v. Wingate, 274 S.C. 62, 261 S.E.2d 50, 51 (1979) ... The most glaring weakness associated with the lay standard is the notion ... ...
-
First Nat. Bank of Bluefield v. Crawford
... ... See Margolies v. Landy & Rothbaum, 136 Ill.App.3d 635, 91 Ill.Dec. 280, 483 N.E.2d 626 (1985); Bonhiver v. Graff, supra; Kemmerlin v. Wingate, 274 S.C. 62, 261 S.E.2d 50 (1979); Blue Bell, Inc. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 715 S.W.2d 408 (Tex.Civ.App.1986). Cf. Costa v ... ...
-
Robert Wooler Co. v. Fidelity Bank
... ... Klein, 45 Misc.2d 1054, 1056, 258 N.Y.S.2d 501, 505-506 (1965); Richard v. Staehle, 70 Ohio App.2d 93, 97, 434 N.E.2d 1379, 1384 (1980); Kemmerlin v. Wingate, 274 S.C. 62, 64, 261 S.E.2d 50, 51 (1979); Delmar Vineyard v. Timmons, C.P.A., 486 S.W.2d 914, 920 ... Page 1032 ... ...
-
Buke, LLC v. Cross Country Auto Sales, LLC
... ... See, e.g., Rino v. Mead, 55 P.3d 13, 19 (Wyo.2002); Kemmerlin v. Wingate, 274 S.C. 62, 261 S.E.2d 50, 51 (1979) (noting that standard of care for accountants is the same as for doctors and other professionals, ... ...