Kendrick v. Metropolitan Psychiatric Center, Inc., 61430
Decision Date | 28 May 1981 |
Docket Number | No. 61430,61430 |
Citation | 282 S.E.2d 361,158 Ga.App. 839 |
Parties | KENDRICK v. METROPOLITAN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER, INC. et al. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Ted D. Spears, Atlanta, for appellant.
William S. Shelfer, Jr., Decatur, Lorraine Hess, Hunter S. Allen, Jr., Atlanta, for appellees.
Plaintiff brought suit against defendants for false imprisonment and for assault incident thereto. Upon the close of plaintiff's presentation of evidence, the trial court granted defendants' motions for directed verdict. We reverse.
The pertinent facts giving rise to plaintiff's action are as follows: Plaintiff, the mother of a voluntary patient at the Metropolitan Psychiatric Center, Inc. ("Center") (an emergency receiving facility under Code Ann. § 88-404.1) went to the Center on March 28, 1978, at approximately 5:00 p. m., in response to a phone call from defendant Parker (an alcohol and drug counselor at the Center), requesting her to come to the Center, presumably to discuss her daughter's treatment and condition with defendant Dr. Uzee. Believing the plaintiff to be an alcoholic in acute withdrawl, Dr. Uzee urged the plaintiff to have herself voluntarily committed. When she refused and attempted to leave the Center, she was forcibly brought back inside by defendants Parker and Shelton. She was then involuntarily admitted into the Center and assigned a room, whereupon she was forced to disrobe and her body and clothing were searched. She was confined in her room until 7:30 a. m. the following morning (approximately 14 and a half hours) and then released.
Defendants' motions for directed verdict were granted on the ground that their actions were in compliance with Code Ann. § 88-401 et seq. The trial court held that, while plaintiff's detention was obviously involuntary, it was not illegal and, thus, did not constitute false imprisonment. See Code Ann. § 105-901, which sets forth the elements of the offense of false imprisonment. We disagree.
The provisions relevant to the instant case read, respectively, as follows: Code Ann. § 88-404.2. Admission to an emergency receiving facility. "(a) Any physician within this State may execute a certificate stating that he has personally examined a person within the preceding 48 hours and found that, based upon observations set forth in the certificate, the person appears to be an alcoholic, a drug dependent individual, or a drug abuser requiring involuntary treatment. A physician's certificate shall expire seven days after it is executed. Any peace officer, within 72 hours after receiving such certificate, shall make diligent efforts to take into custody the person named in the certificate and to deliver him forthwith to the nearest available emergency receiving facility serving the county in which the patient is found, where he shall be received for examination.
Code Ann. § 88-404.4. Examination in emergency receiving facility.
It is readily apparent that Code Ann. § 88-404.2(b) is not applicable, since no court order formed the basis for plaintiff's examination at the Center. Nor is subsection (c) applicable, since a peace officer did not "deliver" the plaintiff to the Center. The finding, however, that defendants complied with both §§ 88-404.2(a) and 88-404.4 is necessary to a determination that plaintiff's detention and confinement were lawful.
While we would agree with d...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Boatright v. State
...18.Williams v. Smith, 179 Ga.App. 712, 715(2), 348 S.E.2d 50 (1986) (punctuation omitted); see also Kendrick v. Metro. Psychiatric Ctr., Inc., 158 Ga.App. 839, 841, 282 S.E.2d 361 (1981) (physical precedent only). 19.Williams, 179 Ga.App. at 715(2), 348 S.E.2d 50 (punctuation omitted); see ......
-
Bradley Center, Inc. v. Wessner
...the need "of ensuring that individual rights are not eroded in the name of medical expediency" (Kendrick v. Metro. Psychiatric Center, 158 Ga.App. 839, 842, 282 S.E.2d 361 (1981)) and posits that if liability is imposed upon psychiatrists for the breach of a duty to "control" their patients......
-
Ellison v. Hobbs
...period of unwanted detention before the certification issues allowing for involuntary treatment. See Kendrick v. Metro. Psychiatric Ctr., Inc. , 158 Ga.App. 839, 282 S.E.2d 361, 364 (1981) (discussing the "time limits for the steps leading to treatment"). This time can be no more than is ne......
-
Williams v. Smith
...and, under subsection (b) of that statute, a court order can serve as an alternative form of process. In Kendrick v. Metro. Psychiatric Center, 158 Ga.App. 839, 282 S.E.2d 361 (1981), we first dealt with the tort of false imprisonment in the context of these statutory provisions for involun......