Key Bank National Association v. Stern
| Decision Date | 31 January 2005 |
| Docket Number | 2003-06022. |
| Citation | 2005 NY Slip Op 00532,14 A.D.3d 656,789 N.Y.S.2d 297 |
| Parties | KEY BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Respondent, v. HARRY L. STERN, Appellant, and SARA M. STERN et al., Defendants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly disregarded the plaintiff's initial error in failing to serve upon the defendant all of the papers in support of its motion (see CPLR 2001). Once the plaintiff corrected the error by sending the omitted papers to the defendant, any prejudice due to the error was cured, as evidenced by the fact that the defendant was able to respond to the motion on the merits (see Clark v State of New York, 302 AD2d 942 [2003]; Volpe v Canfield, 237 AD2d 282 [1997]).
Moreover, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's motion to amend the notice of pendency, judgment of foreclosure and sale, and all other documents in the action, nunc pro tunc, to correct a minor typographical error in the legal description of the foreclosed property (see Pacific Lime v Lowenberg Corp., 77 AD2d 737 [1980]; Kaufman v Levey, 142 Misc 243 [1931]; 1 Bergman, New York Mortgage Foreclosures § 15.02).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jpmorgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Grinkorn
...tunc to correct certain typographical errors (see id. at 1226–1227, 993 N.Y.S.2d 322 ; see also CPLR 2001 ; Key Bank Natl. Assn. v. Stern, 14 A.D.3d 656, 657, 789 N.Y.S.2d 297 )."To successfully oppose a facially adequate motion for leave to enter a default judgment and for an order of refe......
-
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Podeswik
...of foreclosure without jurisdiction ( see Helmer v. McKerrow, 207 A.D.2d 967, 968, 617 N.Y.S.2d 417;cf. Key Bank Natl. Assn. v. Stern, 14 A.D.3d 656, 657, 789 N.Y.S.2d 297). Without jurisdiction, “the default [nunc pro tunc order] is a nullity and must be vacated” ( 2837 Bailey Corp. v. Gou......
-
Enterprises v. Schulman
...the notice of pendency ( seeCPLR 2001, 6501, 6513; Mallick v. Farfan, 66 A.D.3d 649, 649–650, 885 N.Y.S.2d 774;Key Bank Natl. Assn. v. Stern, 14 A.D.3d 656, 657, 789 N.Y.S.2d 297;Gross v. Castleton Hous. Corp., 271 App.Div. 980, 68 N.Y.S.2d 393). The parties' remaining contentions are without ...
-
Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Ambrosov
...subject property (see CPLR 2001 ; Schulman Family Enters. v. Schulman, 104 A.D.3d 934, 935, 962 N.Y.S.2d 342 ; Key Bank Natl. Assn. v. Stern, 14 A.D.3d 656, 657, 789 N.Y.S.2d 297 ; LGD Assoc. v. Hastingwood Trading, 220 A.D.2d 350, 632 N.Y.S.2d 573 ). Finally, the plaintiff demonstrated tha......