Kight v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 53262

Decision Date08 February 1977
Docket NumberNo. 2,No. 53262,53262,2
PartiesA. J. KIGHT v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Sumner & Mitchell, Douglas W. Mitchell, III, Douglas, for appellant.

Tillman, Brice, McTier, Coleman & Talley, George T. Talley, Valdosta, for appellees.

SHULMAN, Judge.

Appellant worked in an office in which, apparently, a certain amount of horseplay was indulged in. Some of this activity took place between appellant and a fellow employee, one Amos Fussell. On May 27, 1975, the manager reprimanded both of these employees because of an incident in which appellant called Fussell a "tar baby." There was some evidence that on July 29, 1975, appellant hit Fussell on the nose with a clipboard. The next morning appellant jabbed his fist into Fussell's face. After this fusillade of minimal violence, Fussell came up behind appellant and pulled his chair out from under him, resulting in some injury to appellant. The administrative law judge and the State Board of Workmen's Compensation denied compensation and the Superior Court sustained this determination. The appellant enumerates as error basically that the findings of fact are not sufficient to support the award or the judgment of the trial court. "This court, in workmen's compensation cases, does not insist upon legal precision; and where an award is subject to two constructions, it will choose that which makes the award valid. Gatrell v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co., 226 Ga. 688, 177 S.E.2d 77; Maryland Cas. Co. v. Johnson, 126 Ga.App. 468, 191 S.E.2d 90." American Motorists Ins. Co. et al. v. Brown, 128 Ga.App. 813, 814, 198 S.E.2d 348, 349.

"Neither the Superior Court . . . nor this court can substitute its judgment as to issues of fact for that of the State Board of Workmen's Compensation. We are not authorized to do so by statute (Code Ann. § 114-710) and it has been so held countless times. See annotations under Code Ann. § 114-710, catchwords 'conclusiveness of findings.' If there is any evidence in the record to support them, the findings and award of the State Board of Workmen's Compensation must be affirmed." Continental Casualty Co. v. Weise, 136 Ga.App. 353, 354, 221 S.E.2d 461, 463.

In support of his claim, the appellant raised the "horseplay" theory of recovery. This court, in Bibb Mfg. Co. v. Cowan, 85 Ga.App. 816, 818, 70 S.E.2d 386, 388 has said, however, that: " 'The rule is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Smith v. Ellis
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 10, 2012
    ...is a fellow employee acting for personal reasons rather than in the course of his employment, see Kight v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 141 Ga.App. 409, 410–11, 233 S.E.2d 453 (1977). (e) Summary judgment is proper only when the non-moving party fails to raise a genuine issue of material fact, ev......
  • Phillips v. John Morrell & Co., 17554-
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • December 3, 1991
    ...authorities upon which I rely are: Insurance Company of America v. Hogsett, 486 S.W.2d 730 (Tenn.1972); A.J. Kight v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 141 Ga.App. 409, 233 S.E.2d 453 (1977); Ford v. Barcus, 261 Iowa 616, 155 N.W.2d 507 In reviewing a case such as this, we must determine the substan......
  • Walsh Const. Co. v. Hamilton
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 6, 1987
    ...because by his own testimony Hamilton participated at least by way of a verbal exchange with Mitchell. See Kight v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 141 Ga.App. 409, 410, 233 S.E.2d 453 (1977); Baird v. Travelers Ins. Co., 98 Ga.App. 882, 107 S.E.2d 579 The proper analysis is gleaned from the Shaw ca......
  • City of Atlanta v. Shaw, 72235
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 9, 1986
    ...her injuries did not arise out of her employment with appellant. Id. at 862, 298 S.E.2d at 529. See also Kight v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 141 Ga.App. 409, 410, 233 S.E.2d 453 (1977). Parker v. Travelers Ins. Co., 142 Ga.App. 711, 236 S.E.2d 915 (1977), cited by appellee, is distinguishable o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT