Knecht v. Tusa

Decision Date28 February 2005
Docket Number2004-08350.
Citation15 A.D.3d 626,2005 NY Slip Op 01505,789 N.Y.S.2d 904
PartiesHILARY KNECHT et al., Appellants, v. KATHERYN S. TUSA, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the third cause of action alleging a violation of Judiciary Law § 487. The defendant demonstrated her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that there was no evidence of her intent "to deceive, or a chronic, extreme pattern of legal delinquency that proximately caused the [plaintiffs'] alleged damages" (O'Connell v Kerson, 291 AD2d 386, 387 [2002]; see O'Connor v Dime Sav. Bank of N.Y., 265 AD2d 313 [1999]; Ulrich v Hausfeld, 269 AD2d 526 [2000]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact that they sustained any damage proximately caused either by the defendant's alleged deceit or by an alleged chronic, extreme pattern of legal delinquency by the defendant (see O'Connell v Kerson, supra at 387; O'Connor v Dime Sav. Bank of N.Y., supra at 314; Manna v Ades, 237 AD2d 264, 265 [1997]; Di Prima v Di Prima, 111 AD2d 901, 902 [1985]).

H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Cinao v. Reers
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • January 14, 2010
    ...by the defendant'.” ( Boglia v. Greenberg, 63 A.D.3d 973, 975, 882 N.Y.S.2d 215 [2d Dept. 2009] [ quoting Knecht v. Tusa, 15 A.D.3d 626, 627, 789 N.Y.S.2d 904 (2d Dept. 2005) ].) “Motions for leave to amend pleadings should be freely granted, absent prejudice or surprise directly resulting ......
  • Amalfitano v. Rosenberg
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • July 15, 2008
    ...alleged chronic, extreme pattern of legal delinquency by the defendant.'") (emphasis in original) (quoting Knecht v. Tusa, 789 N.Y.S.2d 904, 904, 15 A.D.3d 626, 627 (2d Dep't 2005)); Parklex Assocs. ex rel. Holtkamp v. Parklex Assocs., 841 N.Y.S.2d 220 (table), 15 Misc.3d 1125(A) (N.Y.Sup.C......
  • Dupree v. Voorhees
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 30, 2013
    ...Yim Lau, 50 A.D.3d 758, 759, 855 N.Y.S.2d 615;Izko Sportswear Co., Inc. v. Flaum, 25 A.D.3d 534, 537, 809 N.Y.S.2d 119;Knecht v. Tusa, 15 A.D.3d 626, 627, 789 N.Y.S.2d 904), they should not be followed, as the only liability standard recognized in Judiciary Law § 487 is that of an intent to......
  • Lawrence Ripak Co. v. Gdanski
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 19, 2016
    ...& Graifman, P.C., 121 A.D.3d 775, 994 N.Y.S.2d 171 ; Pui Sang Lai v. Shuk Yim Lau, 50 A.D.3d 758, 855 N.Y.S.2d 615 ; Knecht v. Tusa, 15 A.D.3d 626, 789 N.Y.S.2d 904 ; O'Connell v. Kerson, 291 A.D.2d 386, 736 N.Y.S.2d 895 ). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fac......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT