Knudson v. City of Decorah
Decision Date | 20 December 2000 |
Docket Number | No. 99-0987.,99-0987. |
Citation | 622 N.W.2d 42 |
Parties | Karl KNUDSON and Crisan Singer, Appellants, v. CITY OF DECORAH, Appellee. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Karl G. Knudson, Decorah, for appellants.
Richard D. Zahasky, Decorah, for appellee.
Considered en banc.
In this proceeding, Karl Knudson and Crisan Singer challenged the City of Decorah's (City) decision to issue tax increment finance bonds pursuant to Iowa Code chapter 403 (1997), Iowa's Urban Renewal Law, for a residential development in an urban renewal area. They did so by filing appeal to the district court pursuant to Iowa Code section 403.9(3) and a declaratory judgment action. The district court sustained the City's motion for summary judgment dismissing both the appeal and declaratory judgment action. Knudson and Singer appeal, raising issues concerning the validity of certain actions the City took under chapter 403. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
To understand the issues in this case, we think it would be helpful to discuss several provisions in chapter 403 before proceeding to the facts, procedural history, and merits.
Iowa Code § 403.2(1).
Iowa Code § 403.2(3) (emphasis added).
Iowa Code § 403.6(1) (emphasis added).
An urban renewal project may include undertakings and activities of a municipality in an urban renewal area for the elimination and for the prevention of the development or spread of slums and blight, [and] may include the designation and development of an economic development area in the urban renewal area....
Iowa Code § 403.17(24) (emphasis added).
An "urban renewal area" is "a slum area, blighted area, economic development area, or combination of the areas, which the local governing body designates as appropriate for an urban renewal project." Iowa Code § 403.22 (emphasis added).
Iowa Code § 403.17(9) (emphasis added).
An "urban renewal plan" is defined as "a plan for the development, redevelopment, improvement, or rehabilitation of a designated urban renewal area, as it exists from time to time." Iowa Code § 403.23.
To pay for renewal projects, municipalities have the "power to periodically issue bonds in [their] discretion to pay the costs of carrying out the purposes and provisions" of chapter 403. Iowa Code § 403.9(1). Municipalities may use tax money obtained through levies on taxable property in the urban renewal area to (1) pay the principal of and interest on such bonds used to finance in whole or in part an urban renewal project within the urban renewal area and (2) provide assistance for low and moderate income family housing. Iowa Code § 403.19(2).
Iowa Code § 403.22(1) (emphasis added). This provision goes on to explain the formula for calculating the amount to be provided for low and moderate income (LMI) family housing assistance. See id. The formula essentially requires that a percentage of the original project cost be devoted to LMI family housing assistance.
Before a municipality may exercise the powers granted it under chapter 403, its local governing body must adopt a resolution finding that:
1. One or more slum, blighted, or economic development areas exist in the municipality.
2. The rehabilitation, conservation, redevelopment, development, or a combination thereof, of the area is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, or welfare of the residents of the municipality.
Iowa Code § 403.4 (emphasis added).
Iowa Code § 403.5(1) (emphasis added).
Id. Nevertheless, "[t]he additional action of the local governing body is final and conclusive unless the court finds that the municipality exceeded its authority." Id.
It is against this background that we now turn to the facts and procedural history of this case.
On June 17, 1997, the City designated 200 acres within its corporate limits as a "Hospital Medical and Residential Urban Renewal Area" (Renewal Area), according to a "resolution of necessity." See Iowa Code §§ 403.4, .17(22) (1995). The resolution stated that the area had been determined appropriate for designation as an economic development area because, as the City concedes, the area was "appropriate for public improvements related to housing and residential development."
On July 15 the City passed a resolution approving an "Urban Renewal Plan" (Renewal Plan) concerning the Renewal Area. See Iowa Code § 403.17(23) (1997).
On November 4 the City adopted a "Resolution Approving an Urban Renewal Project" (Renewal Project) submitted to it by Aase Haugen Properties, Inc. and Highland Place, Inc., owners of approximately 162 of the 200 acres designated as the Renewal Area. See Iowa Code § 403.17(24). The Renewal Project proposed the construction of senior housing and other residential structures and called for tax increment financing.
On April 21, 1998, the City entered into an "Agreement of Redevelopment" (Redevelopment Agreement) with Aase Haugen Properties, Inc. and Highland Place, Inc., pertaining to the development of the Renewal Area. The same day the City adopted a resolution approving the Redevelopment Agreement.
The Redevelopment Agreement called for the construction of public improvements within a portion of the Renewal Area designated as "Phase I." These improvements included "water, sanitary sewer, street, curb and gutter, storm sewer, lighting, regulatory and warning signs, and retaining walls necessary for street construction, including engineering costs associated with such improvements." The agreement provided for tax increment financing for these improvements.
The Phase 1 public improvements were divided into two...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Channon v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
...1. Scope of Review. We review a ruling granting a motion for summary judgment for correction of errors at law. Knudson v. City of Decorah, 622 N.W.2d 42, 48 (Iowa 2000). Summary judgment is proper the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with ......
-
Grovijohn v. Virjon, Inc.
...for summary judgment is for correction of errors at law. Kolbe v. State, 625 N.W.2d 721, 725 (Iowa 2001) (citing Knudson v. City of Decorah, 622 N.W.2d 42, 48 (Iowa 2000)). Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, t......
-
Hansen v. ANDERSON, WILMARTH
...ruling. II. Scope of Review. We review a ruling granting a summary judgment motion for correction of errors at law. Knudson v. City of Decorah, 622 N.W.2d 42, 48 (Iowa 2000). Summary judgment is appropriate the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, toge......
-
Walters v. Kautzky, 02-1177.
...law. Grovijohn v. Virjon, Inc., 643 N.W.2d 200, 202 (Iowa 2002); Kolbe v. State, 625 N.W.2d 721, 725 (Iowa 2001); Knudson v. City of Decorah, 622 N.W.2d 42, 48 (Iowa 2000). It is legal error to grant such a motion if the facts viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party suppor......