Kolajo by Kolajo v. City of New York

Decision Date16 March 1998
Citation670 N.Y.S.2d 52,248 A.D.2d 512
Parties, 1998 N.Y. Slip Op. 2533 Emanuel KOLAJO, etc., et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Jeffrey D. Friedlander, Acting Corporation Counsel, New York City (Kristin M. Helmers and Deborah R. Douglas, of counsel), for appellant.

Moskowitz, Passman & Edelman, New York City (Jeffrey M. Motelson, of counsel), for respondents.

Before ROSENBLATT, J.P., and SULLIVAN, JOY, ALTMAN and LUCIANO, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant City of New York appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated January 31, 1997, which denied its motion to vacate an order of the same court, dated January 18, 1996, granting the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability upon the City's default in responding to the motion.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that on a motion to vacate a default pursuant to CPLR 5015(a), a defendant must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, 238 A.D.2d 568, 657 N.Y.S.2d 66; Fennell v. Mason, 204 A.D.2d 599, 612 N.Y.S.2d 416). A court may, in its discretion, accept law office failure as a reasonable excuse (see, CPLR 2005; Putney v. Pearlman, 203 A.D.2d 333, 612 N.Y.S.2d 919; Vierya v. Briggs & Stratton Corp., 166 A.D.2d 645, 561 N.Y.S.2d 74), "but 'a pattern of willful default and neglect' should not be excused" (Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, supra, quoting Gannon v. Johnson Scale Co., 189 A.D.2d 1052, 592 N.Y.S.2d 881).

In the instant case, not only did the City of New York repeatedly fail to comply with the court's discovery orders or pay court-ordered sanctions for a period of 22 months after a preliminary conference order was issued, but it failed to respond to the plaintiffs' summary judgment motion because its counsel misread the motion papers. Furthermore, the City waited approximately seven months before moving to vacate its default. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied the City's motion to vacate its default in responding to the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Moreover, the City's affidavit of merit, which contained only conclusory assertions and denials of negligence, was insufficient to establish a meritorious defense (see, Peterson v. Scandurra...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Boyce v. Citibank, N.A. (In re Boyce)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of New York
    • December 15, 2015
    ...excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (Wynne v. Wagner 262 A.D.2d 556, 693 N.Y.S.2d 60 [2d Dept. 1999]; see Kolajo v. City of New York, 248 A.D.2d 512, 670 N .Y.S.2d 52 [2d Dept. 1998]; Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, 238 A.D.2d 568, 657 N.Y.S.2d 66 [1st Dept. 1997]; Fennell v. Mason,......
  • Carillon Nursing & Rehab. Ctr., LLP v. Fox
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 25, 2014
    ...v. Zapas, 105 A.D.3d 1037, 1038, 963 N.Y.S.2d 408;Bazoyah v. Herschitz, 79 A.D.3d 1081, 1082, 913 N.Y.S.2d 769;Kolajo v. City of New York, 248 A.D.2d 512, 670 N.Y.S.2d 52). Furthermore, where, as here, there is a pattern of willful default and neglect, the negligence of the attorney is prop......
  • Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cean Owens, LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 16, 2013
    ...defense to the action ( see Garal Wholesalers, Ltd. v. Raven Brands, Inc., 82 A.D.3d 1041, 919 N.Y.S.2d 358;Kolajo v. City of New York, 248 A.D.2d 512, 513, 670 N.Y.S.2d 52;Lener v. Club Med, 168 A.D.2d 433, 435, 562 N.Y.S.2d 556). The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit. Th......
  • Bazoyah v. Herschitz
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 28, 2010
    ...837, 838, 886 N.Y.S.2d 614;Santiago v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 10 A.D.3d 393, 394, 780 N.Y.S.2d 764; Kolajo v. City of New York, 248 A.D.2d 512, 670 N.Y.S.2d 52). Furthermore, the plaintiff failed to establish that she had a potentially meritorious opposition to the defendants'......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT