L.D.H., In Interest of
Decision Date | 25 May 1994 |
Docket Number | No. A94A0513,A94A0513 |
Citation | 444 S.E.2d 387,213 Ga.App. 297 |
Parties | In the Interest of L.D.H., a child. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Martin & Martin, Karen K. Martin, Barnesville, for appellant.
Tommy K. Floyd, Dist. Atty., Marie R. Banks, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
The juvenile court found that L.D.H. committed the offense of murder and adjudicated him a delinquent. L.D.H. appeals from that order.
The transcript from the commitment hearing reveals that L.D.H. and the victim, both minors, argued during the day at a junior high school basketball game and discussed fighting. Later that night, after a birthday party at a local club, L.D.H. and the victim got into a fight during which the victim was stabbed and killed. Several witnesses testified that after the fight had broken up, they heard L.D.H. say either that he was going to "kill" or "cut" the victim. At least two witnesses heard L.D.H. say "I told you I was going to cut you." A police officer responded to the scene and found the victim on the ground with a stab wound. The officer asked who did this, and L.D.H. stated that he did it. L.D.H. then gave the officer the knife. At trial, L.D.H. contended that he did not mean to cut the victim and that he only had the knife out to scare him.
1. L.D.H. first argues that the trial judge erred in allowing the mother of the victim to remain in the courtroom during the hearing. OCGA § 15-11-28(c) provides: The trial judge found that the victim's mother had attended a previous hearing and was familiar with the case and that she had a proper interest in the proceedings. Consequently, the judge exercised his discretion and allowed the victim's mother to remain in the courtroom. OCGA § 15-11-28(c) "vests the juvenile judge with a broad discretion which this court has no right to control absent a manifest abuse of discretion." (Citations omitted.) B.J.L. v. State of Ga., 173 Ga.App. 317, 319(3), 326 S.E.2d 519 (1985). We find no abuse of discretion.
2. In his second enumeration of error, L.D.H. argues that the trial court should have granted his motion for directed verdict. (Citations...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Calhoun
... ... discipline unless the circumstances suggest the attorney is, ... in fact, unfit to practice. Calhoun states that his interest ... in pursuing his ... livelihood, and his clients' right to counsel of their ... choice, should outweigh the State Bar's interest ... ...
-
Blair v. State
...the evidence met the test of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). In the Interest of L.D.H., 213 Ga.App. 297, 298(2), 444 S.E.2d 387 (1994). In applying the test, we take into account OCGA § 24-4-6. It prohibits a conviction on circumstantial evidence unl......
-
In re Q.P.
...815, 307 S.E.2d 707 (1983). 2. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); In the Interest of L.D.H., 213 Ga.App. 297, 298, 444 S.E.2d 387 (1994). 3. In the Interest of A.D.C., 228 Ga.App. 829, 830, 493 S.E.2d 38 4. Jenkins v. State, 201 Ga.App. 395, 411 S.E......
-
Atlanta Indoor Advertising Concepts, Inc. v. World Class Fitness, Inc., A94A0494
... ... Plaintiff sued defendant for breach of contract and quantum meruit, seeking damages in the amount of $5,500 plus attorney fees and interest on the unpaid balance of the contract fee. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted defendant's motion and denied ... ...