L. L. S. v. State, B-7601
| Citation | 569 S.W.2d 495 |
| Decision Date | 26 July 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. B-7601,B-7601 |
| Parties | L. L. S., Petitioner, v. STATE of Texas, Respondent. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
David T. Lancaster and Steven P. Amis, Dallas, for petitioner.
Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., Maridell Templeton, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, for respondent.
The Application for Writ of Error is refused, "No Reversible Error." Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
We note the further writing of the Court of Civil Appeals questioning its jurisdiction and directing that future appeals shall be governed by Rule 385. 565 S.W.2d 252. We disagree. As to this, we hold that the thirty-day period for the filing of the notice of appeal "as in civil cases generally," see Section 56.01(d) of the Family Code, is applicable to appeals from an order of the trial court waiving its exclusive jurisdiction and transferring the juvenile to a criminal district court for prosecution as an adult.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
R. G. S., In re
...to complain of them. In the recent case of L. L. S. v. State, 565 S.W.2d 252 (Tex.Civ.App. Dallas), writ ref'd n. r. e. per curiam, 569 S.W.2d 495 (Tex.1978), the court properly held that a juvenile court, on its own motion, could continue a hearing. The court We do not interpret section 53......
-
J.L.W., Matter of, 08-95-00114-CV
...1978, writ ref'd n.r.e.); L.L.S. v. State, 565 S.W.2d 252, 255-56 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 569 S.W.2d 495 (Tex.1978). Despite the weight of authority to the contrary, appellant invites this Court to follow a different path and hold that the requirement of § 53.0......
-
Melendez v. State
...being shown by the record. L.L.S. v. State, 565 S.W.2d 252, 255-56 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 569 S.W.2d 495 (Tex.1978). The San Antonio court of appeals agreed with this interpretation and held that the 10 day requirement does not impose a jurisdictional limitati......
-
Williams v. State
...Section 53.05 and compels dismissal. In L.L.S. v. State, 565 S.W.2d 252 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curium, 569 S.W.2d 495 (Tex.1978), the court refused to interpret Section 53.05 as imposing a jurisdictional limitation requiring dismissal of the proceeding absent a waiver......