Lamacchia v. Schwartz
Decision Date | 03 April 2012 |
Citation | 941 N.Y.S.2d 245,2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 02464,94 A.D.3d 712 |
Parties | John LAMACCHIA, etc., appellant, v. Mark A. SCHWARTZ, defendant,Good Samaritan Hospital, respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Silverstein & Bast, New York, N.Y. (Michael M. Bast of counsel), for appellant.
Kral Clerkin Redmond Ryan Perry & Van Etten, LLP, Melville, N.Y. (Geoffrey H. Pforr of counsel), for respondent.
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, SHERI S. ROMAN, and SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated November 23, 2010, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel discovery of certain records and granted the cross motion of the defendant Good Samaritan Hospital pursuant to CPLR 3103 for a protective order with respect to those records, and (2) an order of the same court dated April 6, 2011, which denied his motion for leave to renew and reargue.
ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.
The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants, Mark A. Schwartz (hereinafter Schwartz) and Good Samaritan Hospital (hereinafter the Hospital), alleging that, as a result of the defendants' malpractice, his wife sustained a heart attack during a procedure to insert a device known as a port-a-cath, which administers medication. The plaintiff alleged that the Hospital negligently allowed Schwartz to have attending privileges at the Hospital. The plaintiff also claimed that, following an internal...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Siegel v. Snyder
...meeting who is a party to an action or proceeding the subject matter of which was reviewed at such meeting’ " ( Lamacchia v. Schwartz, 94 A.D.3d 712, 714, 941 N.Y.S.2d 245, quoting Logue v. Velez, 92 N.Y.2d at 18, 677 N.Y.S.2d 6, 699 N.E.2d 365 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Educat......
-
Jovanovic v. Jovanovic
...which was, in effect, for leave to reargue is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument ( see Lamacchia v. Schwartz, 94 A.D.3d 712, 941 N.Y.S.2d 245;Grossman v. New York Life Ins. Co., 90 A.D.3d 990, 935 N.Y.S.2d 643); and it is further, ORDERED that the order dated June......
-
30-40 E. Main St. Bayshore, Inc. v. Republic Franklin Ins. Co.
...motion which was for leave to reargue is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument ( see Lamacchia v. Schwartz, 94 A.D.3d 712, 941 N.Y.S.2d 245); and it is further, ORDERED that the order entered January 17, 2012, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further, ......
-
Siegel v. Snyder
... ... or proceeding the subject matter of which was reviewed at ... such meeting'" ( Lamacchia v Schwartz , 94 ... A.D.3d 712, 714, quoting Logue v Velez , 92 N.Y.2d at ... 18 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Education ... ...
-
D. Medical Malpractice Discovery
...Kraut v. West, 184 Misc. 2d 539, 708 N.Y.S.2d 836 (Sup. Ct., N.Y. Co. 2000).[270] D'Angelis, 2 A.D.3d 1477.[271] Lamacchia v. Schwartz, 94 A.D.3d 712 (2d Dep't 2012).[272] Santero v. Kotwal, 4 A.D.3d 464, 772 N.Y.S.2d 342 (2d Dep't 2004); LaForte v. Staten Island Univ. Hosp., 2003 WL 212623......
-
D. Medical Malpractice Discovery
...Kraut v. West, 184 Misc. 2d 539, 708 N.Y.S.2d 836 (Sup. Ct., N.Y. Co. 2000).[287] D'Angelis, 2 A.D.3d 1477.[288] Lamacchia v. Schwartz, 94 A.D.3d 712 (2d Dep't 2012).[289] Santero v. Kotwal, 4 A.D.3d 464, 772 N.Y.S.2d 342 (2d Dep't 2004); LaForte v. Staten Island Univ. Hosp., 2003 WL 212623......
-
28.8 D. Protective Orders
...Kneisel v. QPH, Inc., 124 A.D.3d 729, 2 N.Y.S.3d 195 (2d Dep’t 2015).[864] . See Logue, 92 N.Y.2d at 18; see also Lamacchia v. Schwartz, 94 A.D.3d 712, 941 N.Y.S.2d 245 (2d Dep’t...