Lambert v. State, 37850
Decision Date | 12 March 1951 |
Docket Number | No. 37850,37850 |
Citation | 211 Miss. 129,51 So.2d 201 |
Parties | LAMBERT et al. v. STATE et al. |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
L. A. Wyatt, Jackson, for appellants.
J. P. Coleman, Atty. Gen., John E. Stone, Asst. Atty. Gen., Patterson & Patterson, and E. A. Turnage, all of Monticello, Heidelberg & Roberts, Hattiesburg, for appellee.
ETHRIDGE, Commissioner.
This case involves the validity of an 1873 deed to a sixteenth (school land) section of land, and the application to it of the twenty-five year, adverse possession statute. In holding the deed valid and rendering the judgment for appellants, some analysis of the historical background of sales of sixteenth sections, as well as of the immediate facts and legal issues, is necessary. The action originated as a suit by J. E. Lambert and C. J. Burns, appellants here and complainants below, to remove as clouds on their titles the claims of the appellees to the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 6 North, Range 10 East, Lawrence County, Mississippi. The defendants and appellees are the State of Mississippi, Lawrence County, the Superintendent of Education of Lawrence County, and the Humble Oil and Refining Company, which is claiming under an oil and gas lease from the County to these school lands.
Under the Act of Cession by the State of Georgia in 1802, ceding to the Union certain western territories of Georgia, the sixteenth section in each township was dedicated to the maintenance and support of its public schools. When Mississippi came into the Union in 1817, the Federal statutes and the Georgia Act of Cession operated to convey from Georgia to the State of Mississippi this right in sixteenth section school lands, as soon as the surveys were made and the sections designated. The legal title was vested in the State of Mississippi in trust for maintenance and support of the public schools of the inhabitants of each township. Jones v. Madison County, 1895, 72 Miss. 777, 18 So. 87; Gaines v. Nicholson, 1850, 9 How. 356, 13 L.Ed. 172; Cooper v. Roberts, 1855, 18 How. 173, 15 L.Ed. 338; Pace v. State, 1941, 191 Miss. 780, 4 So.2d 270; Pilgrim v. Neshoba County, 1949, 206 Miss. 703, 40 So.2d 598. Under Mississippi Constitution of 1869, Article 8, Sec. 6, there was no prohibition upon the alienation by the State of these sixteenth section lands.
In the absence of a state constitutional prohibition, such as was adopted in the 1890 Constitution and as now exists, this Court has held that the Legislature had authority to execute the trust for school purposes in its discretion. This is relevant here because the deed in issue was executed in 1873. At that time the method of the execution of the trust was for the decision of the Legislature. Illustrative of the scope of that power is Jones v. Madison County, supra, in which the Court, interpreting the 1850 Mississippi Leasing Act, upheld a state statute authorizing a lease of school lands without the consent of the inhabitants of the township. The power of the State to authorize sale of such lands prior to the 1890 Constitution was recognized in Foster v. Jefferson County, 1947, 202 Miss. 629, 32 So.2d 126, 568, and this seems to be the universal rule in other states also. 50 C.J., Public Lands, Secs. 179, 182-237. For general discussions of these school lands and funds, see Smith v. McCullen, 1943, 195 Miss. 34, 13 So.2d 319; City of Corinth v. Robertson, 1921, 125 Miss. 31, 87 So. 464; Vol. 2, Rowland, Mississippi (1907), p. 669; Vol. 1, ibid., p. 408; Kimbrough, Law of Waste in Mississippi Territory and State, 7 Miss. L.J. 234, 249 (1935); Percy H. Easom, Public School Legislation in Mississippi, 1860 to 1930 (1937), pp. 390-407, Unpublished Thesis, Mississippi State Law Library, Jackson, Miss.; U. S. v. State of Wyoming, 1947, 331 U.S. 440, 67 S.Ct. 1319, 91 L.Ed. 1590 ( ); U. S. v. Morrison, 1916, 240 U.S. 192, 36 S.Ct. 326, 60 L.Ed. 599; for final word on these lands, see Public Law 754, 80th Congress, 2nd Session, June 24, 1948 62 Stat. 596, 1948 U.S. Code Congressional Service, p. 610 ( ).
In 1870 the Mississippi Legislature adopted a comprehensive statute dealing with the sale and lease of sixteenth section lands. Miss.Laws 1870, Ch. 1, p. 1, enacted July 4, 1870. These statutes were reenacted on May 12, 1871, and appeared as Secs. 2015-2021 of the Mississippi Code of 1871. Secs. 2015-2019 provided in part as follows:
noice of such election, stating the object of the election, and the time and place of holding the same; said notice shall be posted in at east five of the most public places in the township. Said election shall be held in the usual manner of holding elections; which election shall be held, and the votes received by three commissioners, appointed by the county board of school directors; upon each ballot shall be written or printed the words 'for sale', or 'against sale'; and if a majority of the votes casts shall be 'for sale' the commissioners shall forthwith report the vote thus taken to the board of directors; and said lands shall be sold by the school directors, at public auction, at the county court house door, or by an auctioneer employed by them, at their expense, to the highest bidder in quantities of not more than eighty acres.
These statutes remained in effect until March 5, 1878, when they were repealed by Miss.Laws 1878, Chap. 14, Sec. 64, p. 114. After the aforesaid Act of 1878, there was no express authority to sell sixteenth section lands, but this power to sell and convey such lands existed from 1871 to 1878 under the aforesaid statutes. Foster v. Jefferson County, 1947, 202 Miss. 629, 32 So.2d 126, 568. The present Mississippi Constitution of 1890, Sec. 211, provides that 'Sixteenth Section lands reserved for the support of township schools shall not be sold * * *.'
The sixteenth section school lands, which are involved in this case, were sold on January 6, 1873, under the provisions of the Code of 1871. The deed, excluding the acknowledgment, provided as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Board of Educ. of Lamar County v. Hudson, 07-CA-58804
...550 (Miss.1975); Holmes v. Jones, 318 So.2d 865, 868 (Miss.1975); Keys v. Carter, 318 So.2d 862, 864 (Miss.1975); Lambert v. State, 211 Miss. 129, 137, 51 So.2d 201, 203 (1951); Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. State, 206 Miss. 847, 854, 41 So.2d 26, 27 (1949); Pace v. State ex rel Rice, 191 Mi......
-
Hill v. Thompson
...The Sixteenth Section lands and lands selected in lieu thereof were granted to the State of Mississippi. See Lambert v. State, 211 Miss. 129, 137, 51 So.2d 201, 203 (1951). .... From these historical circumstances, the current practice in Mississippi with regard to Sixteenth Section lands h......
-
Papasan v. Allain
...The Sixteenth Section lands and lands selected in lieu thereof were granted to the State of Mississippi. See Lambert v. State, 211 Miss. 129, 137, 51 So.2d 201, 203 (1951). By their own terms, however, these Acts did not apply to the lands in northern Mississippi that were held by the Chick......
-
Lipscomb v. Columbus Municipal Separate School Dist.
...as modified by the state constitution, did not prevent the sale of sixteenth section land between 1869 and 1890. See Lambert v. State, 51 So. 2d 201, 203 (Miss. 1951). We in no way question the validity of sales of sixteenth section land made prior to 73. See Hill v. Thompson, 564 So. 2d 1,......