Lanier v. Massachusetts Parole Bd.
| Decision Date | 05 March 1986 |
| Citation | 396 Mass. 1018,489 N.E.2d 670 |
| Parties | Albert E. LANIER v. MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD & others 1 . |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Kenneth J. King, for plaintiff.
Michael W. Dingle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendants.
Before LIACOS, ABRAMS, NOLAN and LYNCH, JJ.
RESCRIPT.
The plaintiff, Albert E. Lanier, a prisoner confined in the Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Norfolk, brought an action seeking (1) a declaration that the defendants violated his rights under art. 12 of the Declaration of Rights of the Massachusetts Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in their actions rescinding an established parole reserve date; 2 and (2) a preliminary and permanent injunction requiring, inter alia, that the parole board reinstate Lanier's rescinded parole reserve date, effectively granting him parole. A judge of the Superior Court entered an order granting a preliminary injunction reinstating Lanier's parole reserve date. The defendants sought interlocutory relief from a single justice of the Appeals Court under G.L. c 231, § 118 (1984 ed.). The single justice ordered the injunction dissolved, and Lanier appealed. We transferred the appeal to this court on our own motion.
A preliminary injunction is appropriate when an evaluation of the plaintiff's claims that he will suffer irreparable harm and that he is likely to succeed on the merits shows that the balance tips in his favor when weighed against the defendant's corresponding claims. Brookline v. Goldstein, 388 Mass. 443, 447, 447 N.E.2d 641 (1983). Packaging Indus. Group, Inc. v. Cheney, 380 Mass. 609, 617, 405 N.E.2d 106 (1980).
The plaintiff has not met his burden of showing the likelihood of his success on the merits. Our statutes and case law indicate that the granting of parole is within the discretion of the parole board. See, e.g., G.L. c. 127, §§ 130, 133 (1984 ed.); Commonwealth v. Hogan, 17 Mass.App.Ct. 186, 191-192, 456 N.E.2d 1162 (1983); Woods v. State Bd. of Parole, 351 Mass. 556, 559, 222 N.E.2d 882 (1967). A similar Federal constitutional claim was rejected by the United States Supreme Court in Jago v. Van Curen, 454 U.S. 14, 102 S.Ct. 31, 70 L.Ed.2d 13 (1981). Thus, there is no probability of success shown under Federal law.
Similarly, Lanier cannot show that his success on the merits under art. 12 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights is likely--until the courts of the Commonwealth determine that he is entitled to greater protection under that article and the relevant State statutory scheme than under the Federal...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Doe v. Mass. Parole Bd.
...See also Buckley v. Quincy Div. of the Dist. Ct. Dept., 395 Mass. 815, 817 n. 1, 482 N.E.2d 511 (1985) ; Lanier v. Massachusetts Parole Bd., 396 Mass. 1018, 1019, 489 N.E.2d 670 (1986) ; Greenman, 405 Mass. at 388 n. 3, 540 N.E.2d 1309; Quegan, 423 Mass. at 836, 673 N.E.2d 42. See generally......
-
Comm. for Pub. Counsel Servs. v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
...is a discretionary act of the parole board." Amirault, 415 Mass. at 116-117, 612 N.E.2d 631, citing Lanier v. Massachusetts Parole Bd., 396 Mass. 1018, 1018, 489 N.E.2d 670 (1986). "It is a function of the executive branch of government." Amirault, supra, citing Stewart v. Commonwealth, 413......
-
Lanier v. Fair
...On March 5, 1986, the Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the dissolution of the preliminary injunction in Lanier v. Massachusetts Parole Board, 396 Mass. 1018, 489 N.E.2d 670 (1986). In a brief opinion the Court concluded that Lanier had not met his burden of showing a likelihood of success on......
-
Quegan v. Massachusetts Parole Bd.
...of Rights might extend greater procedural protections to Quegan than does the Federal Constitution (see Lanier v. Massachusetts Parole Bd., 396 Mass. 1018, 1019, 489 N.E.2d 670 [1986] ), consideration in a parole decision of a prisoner's acknowledgment of his wrongdoing or of his refusal to......