Lawson v. State
Decision Date | 25 August 2006 |
Docket Number | CR-05-0010. |
Citation | 954 So.2d 1127 |
Parties | Kevin LAWSON v. STATE of Alabama. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
William Morgan Rayborn, Brantley, for appellant.
Troy King, atty. gen., and Nancy M. Kirby, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
Kevin Lawson appeals his August 3, 2005, conviction for second-degree robbery, violation of § 13A-8-42, Ala.Code 1975, by the Montgomery Circuit Court. He was sentenced in accordance with the Habitual Felony Offender Act, § 13A-5-9, Ala.Code 1975, to 20-years' imprisonment. He was also ordered to pay court costs, restitution, and $50 to the victims compensation fund in accordance with § 15-23-17(b), Ala.Code 1975.
Lawson and an accomplice robbed a Spectrum convenience store in Montgomery on April 28, 1995. He was arrested the same day, and he posted a $10,000 appearance bond and was released from the Montgomery County jail on May 1, 1995. (C. 2.) He was indicted on June 30, 1995. (C. 2.) From July 10 until August 2, 1995, Lawson was incarcerated at the Autauga County jail on a different charge. He was then released to the Clanton Police Department. (C. 94.) A letter contained in the record from Autauga County Sheriff Herbie Johnson states: "A hold had been placed by Montgomery County and when they were notified subject was being released, they advised they had nothing on him." (C. 94.)
The matter was set for trial on August 28, 1995, but Lawson failed to appear for trial. The trial was reset for September 19, 1995, but again Lawson failed to appear for trial. A capias warrant was issued for Lawson on September 22, 1995.
Sometime before December 1995, Lawson was incarcerated at Rikers Island, a jail for New York City. (C. 14.) He was to be released from Rikers Island on August 26, 1996, but a robbery charge was pending in New York City. (C. 39.) From 1996 until 2004, Lawson was incarcerated in the State of New York, apparently for the conviction of the aforementioned robbery charge. (R. 13.) While Lawson was incarcerated in New York, Autauga County placed a detainer on Lawson. He waived extradition, but Autauga County decided not to prosecute Lawson, and the detainer was removed.
On June 9, 2005, Lawson was detained by the New York State Division of Parole on the Montgomery County robbery charge. (R. 4.) Lawson waived extradition, and the capias warrant was executed on July 2, 2005. (R. 4; C. 2.) A two-day trial was held August 2-3, 2005, before a Montgomery County jury which found Lawson guilty of second-degree robbery. (C. 3.)
Lawson argues on appeal that he was not properly arraigned for the robbery charge and that the trial court thus committed reversible error. The State, in a 12-line argument in its brief, summarily dismisses Lawson's argument as not properly preserved for appellate review. A review of the record, however, makes it obvious that this issue was properly preserved for our review.1
In his "Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Provide a Speedy Trial" filed July 6, 2005, Lawson stated:
(C. 47)(emphasis added). Further, in his "Motion for Defendant to be Released on Bail" filed July 7, 2005, Lawson stated:
(C. 45)(emphasis added). Immediately before trial, the trial judge held a hearing on Lawson's motion to dismiss on speedy-trial basis, during which Lawson testified. During his testimony, the following occurred:
(R. 5.) After Lawson testified, the following exchange occurred:
(R. 7-11) (emphasis added). The trial court then stated:
(R. 11-12.) After the trial, Lawson filed a motion in arrest of judgement or for a new trial in which he stated:
(C. 88-89).
It is readily apparent from the foregoing that before trial Lawson placed the trial court on notice that he had not been arraigned, and the trial court still failed to arraign him. Thus this issue is preserved for our review.
B.
We now turn to the merits of Lawson's argument that the trial court committed reversible error by not arraigning him. Section 15-15-20.1(c), Ala.Code 1975, states:
The Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure also address this issue:
Rule 14.1, Ala. R.Crim. P. Arraignment may happen any time before trial. In fact, a defendant may be arraigned after the jury has been empaneled. Carroll v. State, 445 So.2d 952 (Ala.Crim.App.1983).
A defendant waives arraignment if he does not timely object to not being arraigned. "`Even arraignment and plea can be waived by a defendant's failure to object to the lack thereof until after the jury has returned a verdict.'" Soriano v. State, 527 So.2d 1367, 1372 (Ala.Crim.App. 1988) (quoting Smith v. State, 507 So.2d 579, 580 (Ala.Crim.App.1987)).
However, if a defendant brings to the trial court's attention before trial the fact that he has not been arraigned, and the trial court fails to remedy the...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Morris v. State
-
Morris v. State, No. CR-07-1997 (Ala. Crim. App. 2/5/2010)
... ... Butts , 524 F.2d 975, 977 (5th Cir. 1975), citing United States v. McGough , 510 F. 2d 598, 604 (5th Cir. 1975)." Haywood v. State , 501 So. 2d 515, 518 (Ala. Crim. App. 1986). See also Lawson v. State , 954 So. 2d 1127, 1134-35 (Ala. Crim. App. 2006). Because Morris has failed to show any prejudice based on the delay, this factor must be weighed against him ... After reviewing Morris's claim that his constitutional right to a speedy trial had been violated by the ... ...
- Wilson v. State
- State v. Robinson