Lawson v. Ulschmid, 5989

Decision Date31 January 1979
Docket NumberNo. 5989,5989
Citation578 S.W.2d 434
PartiesJames C. LAWSON, Appellant, v. Robert L. ULSCHMID, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals
OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiff Lawson from summary judgment that he take nothing.

Plaintiff Lawson sued defendant Ulschmid alleging personal injuries resulting from defendant's negligence in an automobile collision occurring on June 16, 1976.

Defendant answered that plaintiff's cause was barred by a compromise settlement of a disputed claim and release entered into by plaintiff with defendant's insurance carrier's representative on June 18, 1976.

Thereafter defendant moved for summary judgment alleging defendant accepted a draft for $375. from its insurance carrier on June 18, 1976; that such draft provided "By endorsing this draft the payee accepts the proceeds of same in full payment of all claims arising from the loss or accident mentioned on the face hereof"; that plaintiff endorsed the draft and received a portion of the proceeds of same; and by such action settled and released all claims against defendant.

Attached to such motion was the affidavit of Matt Walker, Claims Representative of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, which states that affiant's company had liability insurance on defendant's vehicle; that affiant "negotiated a settlement with Wanda Woods and plaintiff, and delivered them a draft dated June 18, 1976 for $375. payable to James Lawson and Wanda Woods; that the draft stated on its face "In payment of loss which occurred about 6/16/76", and on its reverse side stated "By endorsing this draft the payee accepts the proceeds of same in full payment of all claims arising from the loss or accident mentioned on the face hereof"; that the draft was delivered to plaintiff and accepted by him. Attached to such affidavit was the original of the draft for $375. payable to plaintiff and Wanda Woods, containing the language recited above and bearing the endorsement of plaintiff and Wanda Woods. Such check further reflects on the lower left-hand corner of the front " 200 1 $375 ".

ont

Defendant filed opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment alleging existence of genuine issues of material fact; and that the release was procured through misrepresentation and fraud on the part of the insurance company. Attached was defendant's affidavit stating: "I was involved in an automobile accident on June 16, 1976. The car I was driving was owned by Mrs. Ruby Wood, who is the mother of Wanda Wood. On June 18, 1976 I accompanied Miss Wanda Wood to help her get paid for the damage to her mother's car. We went to the insurance office in Irving to get the damage estimated. The man there asked me if I was hurt and I told him 'No, I don't think so'. Then he told us he had estimated the damage to the car to be $375. but that we would have to go to a Dallas office to get the check. He gave us a piece of paper and sent us to Dallas. At the Dallas office we asked to see Matt Walker. He came and got us and took us back to his office. We gave him the paper we had gotten at the other office. He asked how the check should be made out and Wanda said to both of us. I guess she felt obligated to me because I had paid some of her bills before. Then Mr. Walker said 'here's the check for the car,' and we took it to the bank and cashed it. Nobody said anything about that this would compensate me for any injuries I might have. I did not even know I was injured at the time. I thought I was okay and that is what I told the insurance company".

Plaintiff's deposition reflects that the collision on June 16, 1976 "throwed my neck back and I just you know had a pop"; that he first started feeling anything other than being shook up "two or three days later * * * I just started getting a few little pains and more or less sore, and I started getting pains and headaches and I just let it go. Just took aspirins and let it go". He further stated he received bruises to his back and neck in the collision; that he had a little bit of pain and bruises right after the accident, but he thought it was just something minor; that he was sore the night of the accident and the next day and was still sore and hurting on June 18th.

He further testified in his...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Williams v. Glash
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • 2 Mayo 1990
    ...court must overrule Houston & T.C.R. Co. v. McCarty, 94 Tex. 298, 60 S.W. 429 (1901) and must disapprove Lawson v. Ulschmid, 578 S.W.2d 434 (Tex.Civ.App.--Waco 1979, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Champlin Petroleum Co. v. Pruitt, 539 S.W.2d 356 (Tex.Civ.App.--Fort Worth 1976, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Berr......
  • McClellan v. Boehmer
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 7 Noviembre 1985
    ...S.W.2d 81 (Tex.Civ.App.--Corpus Christi 1978, writ ref'd n.r.e.). A similar situation was presented in Lawson v. Ulschmid, 578 S.W.2d 434 (Tex.Civ.App.--Waco 1979, writ ref'd n.r.e.), where appellant was in a collision, accepted and endorsed a draft containing a release of all claims and la......
  • Williams v. Glash, 01-88-01047-CV
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 13 Abril 1989
    ...a property claim. The company uses a different code for personal injury claims. Appellants, relying on Lawson v. Ulschmid, 578 S.W.2d 434 (Tex.Civ.App.--Waco 1979, writ ref'd n.r.e.), argue that this code number evidences State Farm's intent to negotiate a property claim only. In Lawson, th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT