Leboeuf v. State, 89-1945
| Decision Date | 20 December 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 89-1945,89-1945 |
| Citation | 571 So.2d 559,16 Fla. L. Weekly 96 |
| Parties | 16 Fla. L. Weekly 96 Brian G. LEBOEUF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Michael S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Judy Taylor Rush, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
Leboeuf appeals his conviction for robbery and his enhanced sentence (pursuant to the habitual offender statute) of thirty years. The crimes for which he was being sentenced were committed on February 15, 1989, while the 1988 version of the habitual offender statutes was in effect, 1 and prior to the time the 1989 habitual offender statute became law. 2 We strike the sentence and remand for resentencing, on the authority of Taylor v. State, 558 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).
The record here establishes that Leboeuf was previously convicted of multiple crimes committed during February and March of 1984, but was adjudicated and sentenced on one day for all of them. Thus, as in Taylor, the state failed to prove that Leboeuf had been previously convicted of two prior felonies, and that a second felony conviction was imposed for a crime committed after the initial felony conviction.
Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. In all other regards, we affirm the judgment.
AFFIRMED; sentence VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing.
1 Section 775.084(1)(a)1, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988) states:
The defendant has previously been convicted of two or more felonies in this state.
2 Section 775.084(1)(a)1, Florida Statutes (1989) states:
The defendant has previously been convicted of any combination of two or more felonies in this state or other qualified offenses.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Debose v. State, 90-2377
...more felonies, and the sentences on those two or more felonies must not have been entered on the same date. See also LeBoeuf v. State, 571 So.2d 559 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Bernard v. State, 571 So.2d 560 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Crews v. State, 567 So.2d 552 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). The rationale beh......
-
Reyes v. State
...Thus, none of the prior felonies could have been committed after the date of the initial felony conviction. See also Leboeuf v. State, 571 So.2d 559 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Walker v. State, 567 So.2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). In the instant case, since both prior felonies resulted in convictions......