Lee v. Delmar
Decision Date | 03 July 1953 |
Citation | 66 So.2d 252 |
Parties | LEE et al. v. DELMAR. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
W. H. Poe, Orlando, for appellants.
T. P. Warlow, Jr., Orlando, C. B. Myers and Woolfolk & Myers, Lake Wales, for appellee.
This suit involved the legality of a resolution adopted by the Florida Real Estate Commission. The lower court in a final decree held that the resolution in question was illegal and violated the Constitution of the State of Florida. This appeal if prosecuted from that final decree.
The pertinent sections of the law, Chapter 475, F.S., F.S.A., vesting power in the appellants are as follows:
'475.01 Definition of terms used in chapter
* * *
* * *
'(5) A 'registrant' is a person whose name and business address, and in case of a salesman, the name and business address of the employer also, has been placed, and lawfully remains, on said registration list, and said term shall not include any person who has not applied for a renewal certificate within the aforesaid period of six months.
* * *
* * *
'(10) The word 'certificate' or 'registration certificate' shall be deemed to mean a written instrument, prepared according to the regulations and bearing the seal of the commission, which shall be issued to every broker or salesman as soon as registration is granted, and renewed annually thereafter as long as renewals thereof shall be granted, and which shall be prima facie evidence that the holder is a registrant, and that the registration fee for the license year expiring next after the date of issuance which shall be indorsed thereon, has been paid. Such certificate, except nonactive certificate, shall authorize the holder to act as a broker or salesman until the date of expiration, or until the registration is revoked or suspended.
* * *
* * *
'475.04 Duty of commission to enforce this chapter, keep records and educate members of profession
'The commission may examine witnesses and administer oaths, and shall investigate persons doing a real estate business in this state to ascertain if they are violating any of the provisions of this chapter, and keep such records and minutes as shall be necessary to an orderly dispatch of business. The commission shall foster the education of real estate brokers and salesmen concerning the ethical, legal and business principles which should govern their conduct.
'475.05 Power of commission to enact by-laws, rules and regulations and decide questions of practice
The resolution adopted by the appellant Commission, among other things, contained the following:
* * *
* * *
It appears from the pleadings that the appellee had been a registered real estate salesman in Polk County for over six years. Polk County has a population of over 70,000. Appellee had also been a photographer...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hapney v. Central Garage, Inc.
...right to work, earn a living and acquire and possess property from the fruits of one's labor is an inalienable right." Lee v. Delmar, 66 So.2d 252, 255 (Fla.1953); Art. I, Sec. 2, Fla. Const. Implicit in this right is the opportunity to move freely within the labor force in the quest for ad......
-
Wadsworth v. State
...right to work, earn a living and acquire and possess property from the fruits of one's labor is an inalienable right." Lee v. Delmar (Fla.1953), 66 So.2d 252, 255. In Lee, the Florida Supreme Court held that a resolution prohibiting a real estate salesperson from operating part-time was inv......
-
State ex rel. Bodner v. Florida Real Estate Commission
...is that he has failed to furnish proof of apprenticeship for the required period without other occupation or vocation. In Lee v. Delmar, Fla., 66 So.2d 252, we held a 'part-time resolution' of the Real Estate Commission unconstitutional as depriving part time salesmen of the right to work, ......
-
Waltman v. Florida Real Estate Commission
...and sect. 475.25, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. See Miller Company v. Florida Real Estate Commission, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 667; Lee v. Delmar, Fla.1953, 66 So.2d 252. It may further be noted that petitioners were not exempt from the rules of the Commission simply because they were also attorn......
-
An Ethical Rabbit Hole: Model Rule 4.4, Intentional Interference With Former Employee Non-disclosure Agreements and the Threat of Disqualification, Part Ii
...course of his employment, are not the property of his employer."). See generally Unikel, supra note 15, at 849. 66. E.g., Lee v. Delmar, 66 So.2d 252, 255 (Fla. 1953) ("The right to work ... [and] earn a living ... is an inalienable right."); ILG Indus. v. Scott, 273 N.E.2d 393, 396 (Ill. 1......