Lee v. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co.

Decision Date08 June 1897
Citation41 S.W. 319
PartiesLEE v. UNION CENT. LIFE INS. CO.
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

Appeal from circuit court, Carlisle county.

"Not to be officially reported."

Action by Sallie Lee against the Union Central Life Insurance Company on a life insurance contract. Verdict and judgment for defendant on peremptory instruction, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

John W Ray, for appellant.

I. M Nichols & Son, for appellee.

PAYNTER J.

The appellee's agent, Hanbury, delivered to John T. Lee a receipt as follows: "Received of Jno. T. Lee thirty-nine 62/100 dollars, being the first annual premium on an application for a policy of insurance in the Union Central Life Insurance Company of Cincinnati, Ohio, for two thousand dollars, on the life of J. T. Lee. It is hereby understood and agreed that said J. T. Lee is to be insured from the date of this receipt in accordance with all the provisions conditions and stipulations of the policies of said company provided, said application shall be approved and accepted by said company. If, however, the application shall be declined by the company, this application is to be null and void, and the amount (receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged) is to be returned to said J. T. Lee by me on surrender of this receipt." On that day Lee made an application for a policy of insurance on his life to the appellee, the Union Central Life Insurance Company. The application was sent to the home office of the company, at Cincinnati, Ohio. It was received on the 27th of September. On the same day the medical director of the company approved the application. At some time before the death of Lee, which occurred on the night of the 29th of September, John M. Pattison, president of the company, indorsed on the application "Approved," and issued a policy on the life of John T. Lee, payable to the beneficiary, the appellant, Sallie Lee, and sent it to the state agent for Kentucky. Before its delivery, Lee died. This action is based upon the receipt which Hanbury delivered to Lee. His authority to execute it is not questioned. The receipt stipulates that Lee was insured from the date of the receipt, provided the application shall be approved and accepted by the company. When that was done the contract between Lee and the insurance company was complete, and the company became liable under the contract which Hanbury had made with Lee. Although the company may not have delivered the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Field v. Missouri Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • 26 Agosto 1930
    ... ... Co. v. Ballard , ... 105 Ky. 253, 48 S.W. 1074; Co-operative Ins. Co. v ... Corbett , 69 Kan. 564, 77 P. 108; American Cent ... Ins. Co. v. McCrea , 8 Lea (Tenn.) 513, 41 Am ... Rep. 647; Renier v. Ins. Co. , 74 Wis. 89, ... 42 N.W. 208; Westchester Fire Ins ... v ... Earle , 33 Mich. 143, 152; Ins. Co. v ... Norton , 96 U.S. 234, 24 L.Ed. 689; Union Mut. L ... Ins. Co. v. Wilkinson , 80 U.S. 222, 13 Wall ... 222, 20 L.Ed. 617; Mayfield v. Ins. Co. , 62 ... Mont. 535, 205 P. 669; Halle ... ...
  • Jenkins v. International Life Insurance Co.
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 20 Junio 1921
    ... ... 66 Ark. 612; 40 N.J.L ... 103; 1 Bacon on Ben. Soc., § 272, p. 538; Cooley's ... Briefs on Ins., p. 442 (a) and cases cited; Ib. 451 ... (f), 453 (g) ...          2. The ... ...
  • Horton v. New York Life Insurance Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 14 Julio 1899
    ... ... the case of Cravens v. N. Y. Life Ins. Co., 148 Mo ... 583, and also from the case of Equitable Life Assurance ... Society v ... 9,806.71, with interest thereon at six per cent from April ... 19, 1895." ...          The ... policy which was in evidence is thus ... ...
  • Kempf v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 11 Marzo 1916
    ...is recognized as a form of insurance. 1 Cooley's Briefs on the Law of Insurance, pp. 535-537; 25 Cyc. 714. The case of Lee v. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. (Ky.) 41 S. W. 319, deals with exactly the same question that we have here and is a case where the premium written in the policy was greate......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT