Lee v. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 08 June 1897 |
Citation | 41 S.W. 319 |
Parties | LEE v. UNION CENT. LIFE INS. CO. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from circuit court, Carlisle county.
"Not to be officially reported."
Action by Sallie Lee against the Union Central Life Insurance Company on a life insurance contract. Verdict and judgment for defendant on peremptory instruction, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
John W Ray, for appellant.
I. M Nichols & Son, for appellee.
The appellee's agent, Hanbury, delivered to John T. Lee a receipt as follows: On that day Lee made an application for a policy of insurance on his life to the appellee, the Union Central Life Insurance Company. The application was sent to the home office of the company, at Cincinnati, Ohio. It was received on the 27th of September. On the same day the medical director of the company approved the application. At some time before the death of Lee, which occurred on the night of the 29th of September, John M. Pattison, president of the company, indorsed on the application "Approved," and issued a policy on the life of John T. Lee, payable to the beneficiary, the appellant, Sallie Lee, and sent it to the state agent for Kentucky. Before its delivery, Lee died. This action is based upon the receipt which Hanbury delivered to Lee. His authority to execute it is not questioned. The receipt stipulates that Lee was insured from the date of the receipt, provided the application shall be approved and accepted by the company. When that was done the contract between Lee and the insurance company was complete, and the company became liable under the contract which Hanbury had made with Lee. Although the company may not have delivered the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Field v. Missouri Life Ins. Co.
... ... Co. v. Ballard , ... 105 Ky. 253, 48 S.W. 1074; Co-operative Ins. Co. v ... Corbett , 69 Kan. 564, 77 P. 108; American Cent ... Ins. Co. v. McCrea , 8 Lea (Tenn.) 513, 41 Am ... Rep. 647; Renier v. Ins. Co. , 74 Wis. 89, ... 42 N.W. 208; Westchester Fire Ins ... v ... Earle , 33 Mich. 143, 152; Ins. Co. v ... Norton , 96 U.S. 234, 24 L.Ed. 689; Union Mut. L ... Ins. Co. v. Wilkinson , 80 U.S. 222, 13 Wall ... 222, 20 L.Ed. 617; Mayfield v. Ins. Co. , 62 ... Mont. 535, 205 P. 669; Halle ... ...
-
Jenkins v. International Life Insurance Co.
... ... 66 Ark. 612; 40 N.J.L ... 103; 1 Bacon on Ben. Soc., § 272, p. 538; Cooley's ... Briefs on Ins., p. 442 (a) and cases cited; Ib. 451 ... (f), 453 (g) ... 2. The ... ...
-
Horton v. New York Life Insurance Company
... ... the case of Cravens v. N. Y. Life Ins. Co., 148 Mo ... 583, and also from the case of Equitable Life Assurance ... Society v ... 9,806.71, with interest thereon at six per cent from April ... 19, 1895." ... The ... policy which was in evidence is thus ... ...
-
Kempf v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States
...is recognized as a form of insurance. 1 Cooley's Briefs on the Law of Insurance, pp. 535-537; 25 Cyc. 714. The case of Lee v. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. (Ky.) 41 S. W. 319, deals with exactly the same question that we have here and is a case where the premium written in the policy was greate......