Lewis v. Farm Bureau Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 314
| Decision Date | 02 November 1955 |
| Docket Number | No. 314,314 |
| Citation | 243 N.C. 55,89 S.E.2d 788 |
| Parties | J. B. LEWIS, Administrator of the Estate of William Isaac Lewis, deceased, v. FARM BUREAU MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, and Thomas Gilliam. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Whitaker & Jeffress, Kinston, for defendants, appellants.
Jones, Reed & Griffin, Kinston, for plaintiff, appellee.
Under G.S. § 28-173, Death by Wrongful Act, the personal representative of the deceased has a right of action only when the death of his intestate 'is caused by a wrongful act, neglect or default of another, such as would, if the injured party had lived, have entitled him to an action for damages therefor'. See: Cowgill v. Boock, 189 Or. 282, 218 P.2d 445, 19 A.L.R.2d 405, headnote 3, construing a similar provision in the statute for wrongful death in Oregon. The right of action for wrongful death is based upon this statute, and must be asserted in conformity therewith. Webb v. Eggleston, 228 N.C. 574, 46 S.E.2d 700.
This unemancipated four-year old child, if he had lived, could not have maintained an action against his mother to recover damages for injuries caused by her ordinary negligence. Redding v. Redding, 235 N.C. 638, 70 S.E.2d 676; Small v. Morrison, 185 N.C. 577, 118 S.E. 12, 31 A.L.R. 1135; illuminating annotation 19 A.L.R.2d 423.
In this State an action for wrongful death of this child cannot be maintained against his mother for ordinary negligence resulting in his death, since, had the child survived, he could not have maintained an action against her to recover damages for his injuries. Goldsmith v. Samet, 201 N.C. 574, 160 S.E. 835; Annotation 19 A.L.R.2d, Sec. 13. For a case of gross negligence and intoxication see: Cowgill v. Boock, supra. As to wilful or malicious acts of negligence see: Annotation 19 A.L.R.2d, Sec. 14.
The defendants seek to have the child's mother joined as a party defendant under the provisions of G.S. § 1-240 as a joint tort-feasor. This cannot be done because the defendants cannot invoke either the statutory right of contribution, or the doctrine of primary and secondary liability, against the mother of the deceased child, who is not liable to the plaintiff in this action as a joint tort-feasor. Lovette v. Lloyd, 236 N.C. 663, 73 S.E.2d 886. The doctrine of primary and secondary liability in tort actions is based on active and negative negligence of joint tort-feasors. Bost v. Metcalfe, 219 N.C. 607, 14 S.E.2d 648.
The defendants cannot invoke the doctrine that a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Skinner v. Whitley
...if the injured party had lived, have entitled him to an action for damages therefor.' G.S. § 28--173; Lewis v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., 243 N.C. 55, 89 S.E.2d 788 (1955). In North Carolina and the great majority of other states, the rule is that 'an unemancipated minor child cannot......
-
Raftery v. Wm. C. Vick Const. Co.
...action for wrongful death against the child's negligent parent. Capps v. Smith, 263 N.C. 120, 139 S.E.2d 19 (1964); Lewis v. Insurance Co., 243 N.C. 55, 89 S.E.2d 788 (1955); Goldsmith v. Samet, 201 N.C. 574, 160 S.E. 835 (1931). In Hoover v. R.R., 46 W.Va. 268, 33 S.E. 224 (1899), quoted w......
-
Carver v. Carver
...a wrongful death action against a parent of the child. Skinner v. Whitley, 281 N.C. 476, 189 S.E.2d 230 (1972); Lewis v. Insurance Co., 243 N.C. 55, 89 S.E.2d 788 (1955). Of course there is a very limited exception to the prevailing common law rule in North Carolina created by G.S. § 1-539.......
-
Horney v. Meredith Swimming Pool Co., 691
...would have had no cause of action against the parent on account of his injuries. Goldsmith v. Samet, supra; Lewis v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., 243 N.C. 55, 89 S.E.2d 788; Capps v. Smith, 263 N.C. 120, 139 S.E.2d 19; 3 Lee, North Carolina Family Law (Third Edition), § 248, pp. 174--1......