Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. Johnson
Decision Date | 15 August 1997 |
Citation | 701 So.2d 524 |
Parties | LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF GEORGIA v. Daisey L. JOHNSON. 1940357. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Theodore B. Olson, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., and Jerry S. Fowler, Jr., of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, L.L.P., Washington, D.C.; and Davis Carr and James W. Lampkin II of Carr, Alford, Clausen & McDonald, L.L.C., Mobile, for appellant.
Sidney W. Jackson III and Robert J. Hedge of Jackson, Taylor & Martino, P.C., Mobile; and Wyman O. Gilmore, Jr., of Gilmore & Gilmore, Grove Hill, for appellee.
On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States
Our first opinion in this case was issued on November 17, 1995. On application for rehearing, this Court withdrew that opinion and issued a new opinion, dated April 26, 1996. That opinion is published at 684 So.2d 685. On certiorari review, the Supreme Court of the United States vacated this Court's judgment and remanded this case for us to determine whether the punitive damages awarded in this case are reasonable under the guidelines established by the Supreme Court in BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559, 116 S.Ct. 1589, 134 L.Ed.2d 809 (1996). See Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. Johnson, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 288, 136 L.Ed.2d 207 (1996)(memorandum).
In our April 26, 1996, opinion, we summarized the facts as follows:
Ms. Johnson sued Life Insurance Company of Georgia ("Life of Georgia"), alleging that it had engaged in intentional and reckless fraud and fraudulent suppression by selling her a Medicare supplement insurance policy that was worthless to her because she was eligible for Medicaid. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Ms. Johnson, assessing compensatory damages at $250,000 and punitive damages at $15 million. Life of Georgia moved for a new trial or for a remittitur of damages. The trial judge held a hearing pursuant to Hammond v. City of Gadsden, 493 So.2d 1374 (Ala.1986), Green Oil Co. v. Hornsby, 539 So.2d 218 (Ala.1989), and § 6-11-23(b), Ala.Code 1975. 1 Following the hearing, the trial judge, pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 6-11-21, ordered a remittitur of the punitive damages award to $12.5 million, and this remittitur was accepted by the plaintiff. This Court affirmed, conditioned upon the plaintiff's filing in this Court a remittitur of $7.5 million, resulting in an award of $5 million in punitive damages. 684 So.2d at 702. On remand from the United States Supreme Court, we affirm the judgment of the trial court, conditioned upon the plaintiff's filing in this Court a $9.5 million remittitur of punitive damages, reducing the punitive damages award to $3 million.
After we issued our April 26, 1996, opinion in this case, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari review in this case along with several other cases involving jury verdicts awarding punitive damages. In its BMW opinion, the Supreme Court addressed the constitutional challenge to such verdicts and announced a decision requiring states to judicially review jury verdicts that award punitive damages, to determine whether such verdicts violate the tortfeasor's rights under the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court emphasized that this postverdict judicial review must be meaningful, with special emphasis being given to three "guideposts": (1) the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant's conduct, (2) the ratio of punitive damages to the amount of actual or potential harm suffered by the plaintiff, and (3) a comparison of the amount of the jury's verdict with civil or criminal penalties (if any) that could be imposed under the law for comparable misconduct. BMW, 517 U.S. at ---- - ----, 116 S.Ct. at 1598-1603. 2 This Court, on the Supreme Court's remand of BMW, discussed these guideposts in BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, 701 So.2d 507 (Ala.1997) ("BMW II ").
It is ironic, or at least curious, that the United States Supreme Court has selected mostly Alabama cases to examine for constitutional deficiencies in jury verdicts, because since 1915, long before it was thought to be mandated by the Federal constitution, Alabama has required judicial review of jury verdicts for excessiveness. 3 In reviewing the cases remanded to us for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court's BMW opinion, we have done our best to give effect to every requirement we can read into the BMW opinion and to the requirements of Alabama law for post-verdict review as set forth in Hammond, Green Oil, and § 6-11-23(b), Ala.Code 1975. 4
In discussing the first guidepost, the United States Supreme Court stated:
BMW, 517 U.S. at ----, 116 S.Ct. at 1599. (Citations and footnotes omitted.) Alabama courts consider this "guidepost" in the excessiveness review mandated in Green Oil Co. v. Hornsby, 539 So.2d 218 (Ala.1989). This "guidepost" was enumerated as the second factor in the Green Oil analysis, but the factors set out there were not listed in any particular order of importance, insofar as the weight to be given them was concerned.
The trial judge wrote the following in the Hammond order:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kirkland v. Ssl Americas, Inc.
...anguish damage award of $700,000 for two plaintiffs and punitive damage award of $6 million on a fraud claim); Life Ins. Co. of Ga. v. Johnson, 701 So.2d 524 (Ala.1997) (noting jury award of $250,000 in compensatory damages and $15 million in punitive damages for a fraud claim); Duck Head A......
-
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Owen, 1961950.
...of a duty to disclose. Owen was an educated woman, holding both an undergraduate and a graduate degree. Compare Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. Johnson, 701 So.2d 524 (Ala.1997). She did not come to the table without any knowledge of insurance practices. Compare Foremost, supra. We recognize th......
-
PRUDENTIAL BALLARD REALTY CO. INC. v. Weatherly
...useful benchmark for analyzing whether a punitive-damages award is excessive, see Life Insurance Co. of Georgia v. Johnson, 701 So.2d 524, 535 (Ala.1997) (See, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), but an award based on that ratio is only presumptively reasonable. In this case, a ......
-
Mercy Medical v. Gray
...ratio of 19:1); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Robbins, 719 So.2d 245 (Ala.Civ.App.1998)(same); Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. Johnson, 701 So.2d 524 (Ala.1997)(upholding ratio of 12:1); Union Security Life Ins. Co. v. Crocker, 709 So.2d 1118 (Ala.1997)(upholding ratio of 68:1). C. Comparable Civil ......
-
The Aftermath of Catastrophes: Valuing Business Interruption Insurance Losses
...Id. at 931.108. Id.109. Id. at 932.110. Id.111. Id. 112. DNE, 834 S.W.2d at 934 (citations omitted).113. Life Ins. Co. of Ga. v. Johnson, 701 So. 2d 524, 526 (Ala. 1997) (affirming damages awarded to plaintiff by jury holding that insurer engaged in intentional and reckless fraud by selling......
-
Post-judgment Review of Punitive Damages
...against the defendant in order to warrant mitigation. See, e.g., Talent Tree, 703 So. 2d at 928; Life Ins. Co. of Ga. v. Johnson, 701 So. 2d 524, 534 (Ala. 1997); Williamson, 704 So. 2d at 1366; Enstar Group, Inc. v. Grassgreen, 812 F. Supp. 1562, 1581 (M.D. Ala. 1993). If "criminal sanctio......
-
CHAPTER 2 BAD FAITH CASES AGAINST AN INSURER
...divine and impose. Too big is, in the end, the amount at which five members of the court bridle. In Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. Johnson, 701 So. 2d 524 (Ala. 1997), the Alabama Supreme Court revised the State's regime for assessments of punitive damages. After examining the record, the Supr......
-
CHAPTER 16 PUNITIVE DAMAGES
...The exercise is engaging, but ultimately tells us only this: too big will be judged unfair. In Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. Johnson, 701 So. 2d 524 (Alabama Supreme Court 1997), the Alabama Supreme Court revised the state's regime for assessments of punitive damages. After examining the reco......