LINCOLN LOG HOME ENTERPRISES v. Autrey
Decision Date | 15 February 2002 |
Citation | 836 So.2d 804 |
Parties | LINCOLN LOG HOME ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Tony AUTREY. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
William F. Patty and Daniel O. Rodgers of Beers, Anderson, Jackson, Hughes & Patty, P.C., Montgomery, for appellant.
Gaines C. McCorquodale of McCorquodale & McCorquodale, Jackson, for appellee.
Tony Autrey contracted with Lincoln Log Homes of the South ("Lincoln") to build a log house for Autrey. Lincoln purchases log-home kits from Lincoln Log Home Enterprises, Inc. ("Enterprises"), a North Carolina company, and then hires a contractor to construct the log house on the customer's land and in accordance with Enterprises' instruction manuals. The kits include the logs for the house and the blueprints—in this case, the blueprints were customized for Autrey's house. Lincoln's owners had attended a training seminar conducted by Enterprises at which they were taught how to market and build Lincoln Log houses.
Once construction of Autrey's house began, he had problems with the quality of the construction. The foundation was not level; that caused other problems, including doors and windows that did not fit properly, poorly installed plasterboard and poorly finished walls, and inferior wiring. Before the house was completed, Autrey had the house inspected; the inspectors pronounced it substandard, and Autrey ordered Lincoln to stop work on the house.
Autrey had made a partial payment on the house prior to the inspection. When he refused to pay the balance of the contract price, Lincoln sued, alleging breach of contract and conversion. Autrey counter claimed against both Lincoln and Enterprises, alleging breach of contract, breach of implied warranty, negligence, and fraud.1 The case went to a jury, which found against Lincoln and Enterprises on all counts and awarded Autrey compensatory damages of $505,000 and punitive damages of $600,000. The trial court issued a judgment on the jury verdict and Enterprises alone appeals.
Enterprises argues (1) that the trial court erred in denying its motion for a judgment as a matter of law ("JML") and in submitting Autrey's claims to the jury, (2) that the trial court erred in allowing Autrey to call certain expert witnesses who were not properly disclosed to Enterprises during discovery, (3) that the jury-verdict forms were fatally defective in that they failed to differentiate between compensatory damages and punitive damages, and (4) that the awards of compensatory damages and punitive damages are inappropriate and excessive. Because we hold that the trial court erred in denying Enterprises' motion for a JML and in submitting Autrey's claims to the jury, we do not reach the other issues.
Fleetwood Enters., Inc. v. Hutcheson, 791 So.2d 920, 923 (Ala.2000). The trial court's denial of Enterprises' motion for a JML must therefore be considered in the light most favorable to Autrey; if he presented substantial evidence supporting his claims against Enterprises, that is, "evidence of such weight and quality that fair-minded persons" could reach a verdict in his favor, then we must affirm the denial of Enterprises' motion for a JML.
Enterprises claims that its motion for a JML should have been granted because, it argues, Autrey did not present substantial evidence of an agency relationship between Enterprises and Lincoln.
Ex parte Wild Wild West Social Club, Inc., 806 So.2d 1235 (Ala.2001).
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hooper v. Midland Funding, LLC
... ... and summons upon Hooper at his home address on May 26, ... 2017. [ 6 ] (Doc. 36-24). The form depicts ... , 442 So.2d 20 (Ala. 1983)); ... accord Lincoln Log Home Enters. v. Autrey , 836 So.2d ... 804, 806 (Ala. 2002); [ ... ...
-
Se Environmental Infrastructures v. Rivers
...fact sought to be proved.' West v. Founders Life Assurance Co. of Florida, 547 So.2d 870, 871 (Ala.1989)."' "Lincoln Log Home Enters., Inc. v. Autrey, 836 So.2d 804, 805 (Ala.2002) (quoting Fleetwood Enters., Inc. v. Hutcheson, 791 So.2d 920, 923 Ex parte Williamson, 907 So.2d 407, 414-15 (......
-
The North River Ins. Co. v. Overton
...the movants, bore the burden of establishing an agency relationship between Blythe and North River. See also Lincoln Log Home Enters., Inc. v. Autrey, 836 So.2d 804, 806 (Ala.2002) (holding that a party asserting the existence of an agency relationship has the burden of producing sufficient......
-
Ex parte Williamson
...fact sought to be proved." West v. Founders Life Assurance Co. of Florida, 547 So.2d 870, 871 (Ala.1989).'" Lincoln Log Home Enters., Inc. v. Autrey, 836 So.2d 804, 805 (Ala.2002) (quoting Fleetwood Enters., Inc. v. Hutcheson, 791 So.2d 920, 923 (Ala.2000)). Our review of the circuit court'......
-
Point: Justice Must Satisfy the Appearance of Justice-a 10-year Review of the Alabama Supreme Court's Treatment of Jury Verdicts in the Plaintiffs' Favor
...v. Bentley, 850 So. 2d 232 (Ala. 2002)($1.35 million).22. Jury verdicts reversed in 2002 were: Lincoln Log Home Enter., Inc. v. Autrey, 836 So. 2d 804 (Ala. 2002)($505,000 compensatory and $600,000 punitive); City of Birmingham v. Sutherland, 834 So. 2d 755 (Ala. 2002)($115,000); H.R.H. Met......