Little River Bank & Trust Co. v. Magoffin
| Decision Date | 19 February 1958 |
| Parties | LITTLE RIVER BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Edward T. MAGOFFIN, a minor, by his mother and next friend, Annette G.Magoffin, and Annette G. Magoffin, individually, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Wicker & Smith and Joe C. Brannen, Miami, for appellant.
Nichols, Gaither, Green, Frates & Beckham, Miami, for appellees.
This is an appeal by defendant from verdicts and judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered in the lower court in a negligence suit. At the trial, liability was admitted and the cause was submitted to the jury on the question of damages only under instructions not here complained of. Defendant's only contention on the appeal is that the verdicts were not supported by the evidence.
It has long been the settled rule in this jurisdiction that damages in a personal injury action are for the discretion of the jury. Unless 'clearly arbitrary', Sproule v. Nelson, Fla.1955, 81 So.2d 478, or 'so excessive as to indicate that the jury was influenced by passion, prejudice, corruption, or other improper motive,' Upton v. Hutchison, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 20, 21, or 'so much greater than it should have been as to shock the judicial conscience,' Bartholf v. Baker, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 480, 484, the amount awarded by the jury will not be disturbed on appeal. The burden is on the appellant to establish the fact that the verdict is wholly unsupported by the evidence or was the result of passion, prejudice or other improper motive. Bartholf v. Baker, supra.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Seaboard Coast Line R. Co. v. McKelvey
...Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 480; Handel v. Rudnick, Fla.1955,78 So.2d 709; Sproule v. Nelson, Fla.1955, 81 So.2d 478; Little River Bank & Trust Company v. Magoffin, Fla.1968, 100 So.2d 626; Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Stewart, Fla.App.1962, 140 So.2d 880; Rite Rate Cab Company v. McGee, Fl......
-
Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Clay
...considered individually or collectively, may be deemed excessive. Laskey v. Smith, 239 So.2d 13 (Fla.1970); Little River Bank & Trust Co. v. Magoffin, 100 So.2d 626 (Fla.1958); Coast Cities Coaches v. Donat, 106 So.2d 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958); see Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So.2d 430 (Fla.......
-
Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Braz
...as to indicate passion, bias and prejudice on the part of a jury that should shock the judicial conscience. In Little River Bank & Trust Co. v. Magoffin, Fla.1958, 100 So.2d 626, the Supreme Court * * * * * * 'It has long been the settled rule in this jurisdiction that damages in a personal......
-
Tampa Transit Lines, Inc. v. Smith, 3888
...v. Walters, Fla.App.1961, 126 So.2d 759. 761; Aylesworth v. London, Fla.App.1960, 119 So.2d 816, 818; Little River Bank and Trust Co. v. Magoffin, Fla.1958, 100 So.2d 626; Sproule v. Nelson, Fla.1955, 81 So.2d 478, 481, 76 A.L.R.2d 1066; Loftin v. Wilson, Fla.1953, 67 So.2d 185, 9 Fla.Jur. ......