Live Oak, P. & G.R. Co. v. Miller
Decision Date | 13 June 1916 |
Citation | 72 So. 283,72 Fla. 8 |
Parties | LIVE OAK, P. & G. R. CO. v. MILLER. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Error to Circuit Court, Suwannee County; M. F. Horne, Judge.
Action by Alonzo J. Miller against the Live Oak, Perry & Gulf Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed.
Syllabus by the Court
Where it appears that a plaintiff's injury was 'caused by his own negligence,' he cannot under the statute recover damages from a railroad company for such injury.
[LIVE OAK P & GR CO V MILLER 72 So. 283(1916)] John F. Harrell, of Live Oak, for plaintiff in error.
Stafford Caldwell, of Live Oak, for defendant in error.
This writ of error was taken to a judgment awarding damages for personal injuries. Miller, who was a passenger, alighted from the defendant carrier's train while it was temporarily standing at a point a short distance before reaching the station at Live Oak, Fla. He was struck by the engine while walking on the defendant's track ahead of the train from which he alighted.
The statutes provide as follows:
'A railroad company shall be liable for any damage done to persons, stock, or other property, by the running of the locomotives, or cars, or other machinery of such company or for damage done by any person in the employ and service of such company, unless the company shall make it appear that their agents have exercised all ordinary and reasonable care and diligence, the presumption in all cases being against the company.
No person shall recover damages from a railroad company for injury to himself or his property, where the same is done by his consent, or is caused by his own negligence. If the complainant and the agents of the company are both at fault the former may recover, but the damages shall be diminished or increased by the jury in proportion to the amount of default attributable to him.'
Sections 3148, 3149, Gen. Stats. 1906, Compiled Laws of 1914.
The plaintiff's testimony contains the following:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Davis v. Scott
...cannot be recovered where the testimony shows that the employees exercised all ordinary and reasonable care and diligence to avoid injury. 72 So. 283; 70 So. 998. See 51 Fla. 304; 41 So. 70; 53 Fla. 375; 43 So. 235; 70 So. 437. The damages were not diminished in proportion to the amount of ......
-
Stevens v. Tampa Electric Co.
... ... 381, 83 So. 89; ... Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Miller, 53 Fla. 246, ... 44 So. 247; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Smith, 53 Fla ... 375, 43 So. 235; [81 Fla. 517] Live Oak, P. & G. R. Co ... v. Miller, 72 Fla. 8, 72 So. 283; Tampa Electric ... ...
-
Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Good
... ... Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Miller, 53 Fla. 246, ... 44 So. 247; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Tomberlin, 70 ... v. Bourquardez, 72 Fla. 161, 72 So. 668; Live Oak, ... P. & G. R. Co. v. Miller, 72 Fla. 8, 72 So. 283; ... Seaboard ... ...
-
Director General of Railroads v. Into
... ... 304, 41 So ... 70; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Miller, 53 Fla ... 246, 44 So. 247; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Smith, 53 ... 437; Louisville & N ... R. Co. v. Padgett, 71 Fla. 90, 70 So. 998; Live Oak, ... P. & G. R. Co. v. Miller, 72 Fla. 8, 72 So. 283; ... Tampa ... ...