Livonia Pub. Sch. & Metro. Ass'n for Improved Sch. Legislation v. Selective Ins. Co. of the Se.
Decision Date | 24 August 2018 |
Docket Number | Case No. 16-10324 |
Citation | 443 F.Supp.3d 815 |
Parties | LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS and Metropolitan Association for Improved School Legislation, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHEAST, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan |
James D. Wilson, Wilson Young, Southfield, MI, Daniel J. Zollner, Dykema Gossett PLLC, Chicago, IL, Kathryn J. Humphrey, Dykema Gossett, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants.
Margaret A. Cernak, Nicole E. Wilinski, Collins Einhorn Farrell PC, Southfield, MI, for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.
(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 59); AND
In this civil action, Plaintiffs Metropolitan Association for Improved School Legislation ("MAISL ") and Livonia Public Schools ("LPS ") sue their insurer, Defendant Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast, regarding a set of insurance policies under which both MAISL and LPS (collectively "Plaintiffs ") were named as insured parties. The dispute is over the extent of Selective's obligation to reimburse Plaintiffs for past and ongoing costs that Plaintiffs have incurred in defending three lawsuits alleging misconduct by LPS employees.
Both parties have moved for summary judgment. In the manner fully set forth below, each party's motion shall be granted in part and denied in part.
Plaintiff MAISL is a group self-insured pool of Michigan public school districts formed under the Michigan Intergovernmental Contracts Between Municipal Corporations Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 124.1 et seq. Plaintiff LPS is a public school district incorporated as a municipal corporation under Michigan law. (ECF No. 8, Am. Compl. ¶¶ 1-2.) Defendant Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast ("Selective ") is a commercial insurance company incorporated and headquartered in Indiana. (ECF No. 10, Answer ¶ 5.)
Each policy at issue in this case ran one year from July 1 to July 1. The relevant time period includes three consecutive policy years: 2010, 2011, and 2012. Two policies from each of those years are implicated in this lawsuit, and the significant provisions of those policies are summarized below.
From July 1, 2010 to July 1, 2011, Plaintiffs were insured under two Selective policies that are relevant here: Policy No. S1323571 ("2010-2011 Primary Policy ") , and Policy No. S1317854 ("2010-2011 Umbrella Policy ") (ECF No. 10, Answer Ex. D).
Plaintiffs had policies that were materially identical to these two policies in the subsequent 2011-2012 term (and in fact had the some policy numbers as their 2010-2011 term counterparts). Those policies are discussed in depth below. To avoid redundancy, it is sufficient to say that the following descriptions of the 2011-2012 policies also apply to their 2010-2011 counterparts.
The relevant policies that were in effect from July 1, 2011 until July 1, 2012 are Policy No. S1323571 ("2011-2012 Primary Policy ")1 , and Policy No. S1317854 ("2011-2012 Umbrella Policy ") (Compl. Ex. 4, Pg ID 234-365).
The 2011-2012 Primary Policy is the most central policy to this case, and what follows is a summary of the most significant provisions of that policy.
The 2011-2012 Primary Policy's "General Liability" coverage applies to lawsuits and other claims arising from "bodily injuries or personal injuries, suffered or alleged to have been suffered" as well as "property damage or loss of use." (Compl. Ex. 2, 2011-2012 Primary Policy at Pg ID 109.) Subject to certain exclusions discussed infra , the policy provides that Selective (Id. ) The injury giving rise to the lawsuit "must be caused by an occurrence during the term of [the 2011-2012 Primary Policy]." (Id. ) The 2011-2012 Primary Policy relevantly defines "bodily injury" as "bodily injury, sickness or disease sustained by a person, including death resulting from any of these at any time." (Id. at Pg ID 115.) The 2011-2012 Primary Policy defines "personal injury" as "injury other than ‘bodily injury’ arising out of ... a. false arrest, false imprisonment, detention ...; b. mental anguish and humiliation; c. wrongful entry, wrongful eviction, malicious prosecution; [or] d. an oral or written publication that slanders, libels, harms property value or violates privacy rights." (Id. at Pg ID 115-16.)
Among the various forms and endorsements that affect the scope of the 2011-2012 Primary Policy's coverage is the "Supplemental Declarations" section. The limits for General Liability are set forth in Part III, Section K of the Supplemental Declarations. (See id. at Pg ID 83.) That section provides that there is a $1,000,000 indemnification limit for "[e]ach occurrence,"2 and identifies the "General Aggregate Limit" as "N/A." (Id. ) "General Aggregate Limit" is defined as "the most [Selective] will pay in any year of this insurance for damages and expenses defined by Ultimate Net Loss." (Id. at Pg ID 116.) In a separate section entitled "Common Policy Provisions," the policy states that "[t]he policy limit will not be reduced by defense cost or loss adjustment expenses." (Id. at Pg ID 123.)
Selective's obligations under the policy, subject to the $1,000,000 per-occurrence limit referenced above, are paid to the insured only after the insured first pays a "Self Insured Retention" ("SIR "). (See id. at Pg ID 81 ("The limit of liability under this agreement shall be in excess of the retained amount shown on the Schedule of Self Insured Retentions.").) The Schedule of Self-Insured Retentions provides for a $500,000 SIR "per occurrence or per loss from a covered cause of loss." (Id. at Pg ID 84.)
Two other terms used in the 2011-2012 Primary Policy are important here. First is "Ultimate Net Loss, " which the policy defines as having two components:
(2011-2012 Primary Policy at Pg ID 85 (emphasis in original).)
(Id. (emphasis in original).) The Loss Fund Policy Aggregate in the 2011-2012 Primary Policy is $3,600,000. (Id. at Pg ID 84.)
Bringing all of these terms together, the 2011-2012 Primary Policy states:
(Id. (emphasis in original).)
To summarize the provisions quoted above: absent modification by any other terms of the policy, the 2011-2012 Primary Policy obligates Selective to pay for damages and defense costs incurred based on claims arising from actual or alleged bodily or personal injuries. For each occurrence, the insured must first pay up to $500,000 as an SIR, after which Selective is obligated to reimburse the insured up to $1,000,000 per occurrence. Defense costs reimbursed by Selective do not count towards the $1,000,000 limit, though defense costs paid by the insured do count towards exhausting the SIRs. Although there is a $1,000,000 per-occurrence limit, there is no aggregate limit in the event of multiple occurrences. If the insured's SIR payments reach $3,600,000, however, any costs in excess of that are covered.4
The section of the 2011-2012 Umbrella Policy entitled "Exclusions" sets forth categories of claims that are entirely excluded from coverage under the policy. One of these is Exclusion 7: "Personal Injury arising...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Allstate Vehicle & Prop. Ins. Co. v. Todaro
... ... Metro. Prop. & Liab. Ins. Co. v. DiCicco , 432 Mich ... ...
-
Gissendanner v. Riversource Life Ins. Co.
...estoppel defense because it does not "fall within the two clear examples stated in Kirschner. " Livonia Pub. Schs. v. Selective Ins. Co. of the Se. , 443 F. Supp. 3d 815, 855 (E.D. Mich. 2018). For one, Defendant is not "raising new defenses" after it had "denied coverage to [Plaintiff] and......
-
Powers v. Sec'y of Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
...encourage courts to decide each claim on its merits rather than on procedural technicalities," Livonia Pub. Sch. v. Selective Ins. Co. of the Southeast, 443 F. Supp. 3d 815, 861 (E.D. Mich. 2018), and accordingly declines to deny Plaintiff's motion for this ...