Lopez v. Fidelity and Cas. Co. of New York, 81-737

Decision Date23 March 1982
Docket NumberNo. 81-737,81-737
Citation412 So.2d 394
PartiesIberia LOPEZ, Appellant, v. FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Fernando F. Freire, Miami, for appellant.

James F. Dougherty, II, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Judge.

The plaintiff-appellant settled an automobile accident claim for $3,600 with an alleged joint tortfeasor who had $10,000 of liability coverage with Allstate. This was accomplished without the permission of her uninsured motorist carrier, the appellee Fidelity and Casualty Company, in admitted and unexcused violation of the terms of the UM policy. See Arrieta v. Volkswagen Ins. Co., 343 So.2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Sena v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 305 So.2d 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); McInnis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 208 So.2d 481 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). Since the release given to Allstate and its insured destroyed the subrogated right to contribution arising under the recently enacted Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act, Sec. 768.31(5) Fla.Stat. (1979), which the UM carrier would have secured had it been assessed more than $3,600 1 based on the liability of a phantom vehicle which was also allegedly involved in the accident, prejudice from the breach of the "no-settlement-without-consent" clause was established as a matter of law. See Travelers Ins. Co. v. Gray, 360 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); compare and contrast, Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co. v. Earnest, 395 So.2d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), and cases cited. The summary judgment entered below in Fidelity and Casualty's favor is consequently

Affirmed.

1 If the arbitrators awarded the plaintiff less than $3,600, the settlement would have been set off, and Fidelity would have owed her nothing. Dewberry v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 363 So.2d 1077 (Fla.1978); Volkswagen Ins. Co. v. Taylor, 201 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967).

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Argiro v. Progressive American Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 28, 1987
    ...Property & Casualty Ins. Co., 443 So.2d 127 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), rev. denied, 451 So.2d 848 (Fla.1984); Lopez v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 412 So.2d 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Kaplan v. Phoenix of Hartford Ins. Co., 215 So.2d 893 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 220 So.2d 365 (Fla.1969). "A me......
  • American Fire and Cas. Co. v. Sinz, 84-1914
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 2, 1986
    ...constituted prejudice as a matter of law and therefore voided the coverage, citing in support of that argument Lopez v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 412 So.2d 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Travelers Insurance Co. v. Gray, 360 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Sena v. State Farm Mutual, 305 So.2d 243 (Fla.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT