Lowe v. City of Guthrie
Decision Date | 13 February 1896 |
Parties | T. J. LOWE et al. v. THE CITY OF GUTHRIE. |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
Error from the District Court of Loqan County.
¶0 1. OFFICIAL BONDS--Sureties. The contracts of sureties on official bonds are strictissimi juris.
2. STATUTORY BOND. A statutory bond is one required to be given by some statute.
3. CITY CLERK--Bond. the official bond of a city clerk is one required by statute, and is a statutory bond.
4. OFFICIAL BOND--Contract--Extent of. Sureties on an official bond contract with reference to the law requiring such bond, and regulating the duties of the principal, and these laws enter into and become a part of the contract as much as if incorporated into the bond itself. And the liability of sureties cannot be extended beyond the strict terms of their engagement, as contemplated at the time of giving bond.
5. SAME--Obligation Authorized by Statute Valid. An official bond which contains all the conditions required by statute, and also conditions in excess of those specified by statute, is valid, so far as it imposes obligations authorized by the statute: but the stipulations which are in excess or it may be rejected as surplusage. But if the bond falls so far short of the statutory requirements as to be invalid as a statutory bond, it may be treated as a common law bond, unless prohibited by some statute, or is against public policy.
6. SAME--Construction--General Rule. It is a general rule of construction applicable to official bonds, that general words cannot enlarge a liability fixed by particular words
7. CITY CLERK--Clerical Office. The office of city clerk is, in contemplation of law. a purely clerical office, anti in absence of a statute, or ordinance of the city authorizing the clerk to collect or receive monies due such city, he has no authority to make such collections or receive any monies due the city. And the sureties on his official bond do not contract with reference to any such unauthorized acts. and are not liable for defaults occurring on account of such acts.
8. CITY TREASURER--Law Creates--Duties. The law creates the office of city treasurer: defines its duties, and generally directs the payment of all monies belonging to the municipality to the treasurer, and it was never intended that the city clerk should be the custodian of any monies belonging to the city.
9. CITY CLERK--Bond--Sureties Liable for What. The statute requires the clerk to give a bond for the faithful discharge of the duties of his office. This comprehends every duty required of him by law or ordinance. It embraces the faithful accounting for, and payment to the city treasurer of, all monies that shall come into his hands by virtue of his office. And his sureties can only be held liable for a failure to faithfully discharge such duties, although the terms of the bond may be more comprehensive.
10. OFFICIAL BONDS--Sureties Liable, for What Acts. Sureties on official bonds are liable only for acts of the principle done virtuti officii, and not for acts done colore officil.
11. LIQUOR LICENSE--Payment to City Clerk Unauthorized. The payment of money for liquor license to city clerk is not only unauthorized, but Is in violation of the spirit of the law, which directs its payment to the city treasurer, and the sureties of the clerk are not liable on his official bond for such collections.
12. OFFICIAL BOND--Sureties Not Entitledd to Credit. The sureties on the bond of the city clerk are not entitled to credit for the amount of balance due the clerk for salary, when it appears that the clerk is indebted in a large sum to the city on account of defaults for which his sureties are not liable. A part of his indebtedness being secured and a part unsecured, the creditor has a right to have the credit applied to the unsecured portion.
John F. Stone, for plaintiffs in error.
B T. Hainer, for defendant in error.
¶1 This was an action by the city of Guthrie on the official bond of E.G. Millkan, to recover for monies collected by said Millikan during his term as city clerk of said city. The other defendants in said action are sureties on said bond.
¶2 The petition alleges that as city clerk, Millikan collected and failed to pay over the sum of five thousand three hundred and twenty-five dollars and eighty-five cents, collected for liquor license. The sum of two hundred and eighty dollars, collected from water consumers. The sum of nineteen dollars, collected from various parties for tapping water mains. All of which he had appropriated to his own use.
¶3 It was further alleged that the city had recovered a judgment against Millikan for the sum of three thousand three hundred, seventy-nine dollars and two cents on account of said default which was still unpaid.
¶4 The bond is made an exhibit to the petition and is as follows:
¶5 The sureties first moved for an order to require the city to make her petition more definite and certain by specially pleading the authority whereby the city clerk collected the funds which it was alleged he had failed to account for. The court overruled this motion and the sureties excepted. They then demurred to the petition for the reason that said petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against them on said bond. The demurrer was overruled and exceptions saved. They then filed their answer, which consists of a general denial, also, specific denials that either of the class of funds claimed in the petition was collected by said Millikan by virtue of his office as city clerk.
¶6 Reply was filed, and cause submitted to the court for trial upon an agreed statement of facts, which stipulation is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. American Surety Co. of New York
...359, 6 N.W. 843; School Dist. No. 80 v. Burress, 2 Neb. Unoff. 554, 89 N.W. 609; Board v. Bladen, 113 N.C. 379, 18 S.E. 661; Lowe v. Guthrie, 4 Okla. 287, 44 P. 198; Cottam v. Oregon City, 98 F. 570; South Maryland, 59 U.S. 396, 18 HOW 396, 15 L.Ed. 433.) But it is equally well settled that......
-
Buhl Highway Dist. v. Allred
... ... Abbey, 62 Misc. 84, 116 ... N.Y.S. 259; Scott v. Phillips, 140 Pa. 51, 21 A ... 241; City of Aberdeen v. Honey, 8 Wash. 251, 35 P ... 1097; City v. Brett, 193 N.Y. 276, 86 N.E. 6; ... Ill. 572, 90 Am. St. 177, 64 N.E. 549; State v ... Moore, 56 Neb. 82, 76 N.W. 474; Lowe v. City of ... Guthrie, 4 Okla. 287, 44 P. 198; Aultman-Taylor ... Machinery Co. v. Burchett, 15 ... ...
-
Camdenton Consol. School Dist. No. 6 of Camden County ex rel. W. H. Powell Lumber Co. v. New York Cas. Co.
...People v. Met. Surety Co., 211 N.Y. 107, 105 N.E. 99; People v. Wilson, 169 Ill.App. 452; Chladek v. Brown, 58 Ill.App. 379; Lowe v. Guthrie, 4 Okla. 287, 44 P. 198; Graeter v. DeWolf, 112 Ind. 1, 13 N.E. 111; 9 C. J. 34, sec. 56; M., K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Am. Surety, 291 Mo. 92; Hartford Acc.......
-
Smith Eng'g Works v. Custer
...acting as a board, he was acting only "under color of" office. They rely on Dysart v. Lurty, 3 Okla. 601, 41 P. 724; Lowe et al. v. City of Guthrie, 4 Okla. 287, 44 P. 198; Inman v. Sherill, 29 Okla. 100, 116 P. 426; Jordan v. Neer, 34 Okla. 400, 125 P. 1117; Taylor v. Morgan, 43 Okla. 142,......