Lowry v. Hill

Decision Date16 October 1924
Docket Number7 Div. 448.
Citation101 So. 586,211 Ala. 645
PartiesLOWRY v. HILL.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Probate Court, De Kalb County; G. L. Malone, Judge.

Petition of G. E. Hill to probate the will of Lela Hill Lowry, with contest by C. W. Lowry. Decree for proponent, and contestant appeals. Appeal dismissed.

J. V Curtis and I. M. Presley, both of Fort Payne, for appellant.

Isbell & Scott, of Fort Payne, for appellee.

MILLER J.

This is a proceeding on contest as to the validity of a will. The cause was submitted in this court by the parties on June 3 1924, on briefs, on motions, and on merits.

It appears the appellee on January 14, 1924, filed motion to strike the transcript and dismiss the appeal, and assigns these and other grounds, because there is no appeal bond as required by law, and because the transcript has not been prepared in conformity with Supreme Court rule 26.

No certificate of appeal was filed in this court before this cause was submitted on this motion as required by rule 43 of this court. When this cause was submitted on this motion and on the merits on June 3d, 1924, there was no certificate of appeal in the record, there was nothing in the record to show an appeal had been taken by the appellant, there was no appeal bond in the record, and there was nothing therein to show an appeal bond had been given and approved as the statute directs, and the rules of this court require. Rules 26 and 43; §§ 2837, 2856, Code 1907.

When this cause was submitted to this court on June 4, 1924, there was no certificate by the judge of probate in the record proper, or on file as part of the record, that an appeal was taken, and the time when, from the decree in this cause. These facts so certified give this court jurisdiction of the case. Section 2837, Code 1907; rule 30 p. 1513, Code 1907; Thompson v. Lea, 28 Ala. 453; Robinson v. Murphy, 69 Ala. 547; Boshell v. Phillips, 207 Ala. 628, 93 So. 576.

It is true that on June 4, 1924, the probate judge issued a certificate which was filed in this court on June 6, 1924 stating that an appeal was taken and security for costs in the sum of $300 was given. This was filed after this cause was submitted, and was not in response to a certiorari writ from this court to complete the record, and it fails to state when the appeal was taken, and it cannot, under these circumstances, be considered as part of the record on this motion. It came too late. Authorities supra. It is also true that on June 14, 1924, the judge of probate made and certified to a copy of the appeal bond; it was filed in this court June 16, 1924; it was not in response to an order from this court to complete the record; the bond was made and approved on June 14, 1923, and the decree which it purports to appeal from was rendered as shown by the record on June 15, 1923. This certified copy of the appeal bond...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Williams v. Knight, 8 Div. 731
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 4, 1936
    ... ... would be without jurisdiction to consider it. Boshell v ... Phillips, 207 Ala. 628, 93 So. 576; Lowry v. Hill, 211 ... Ala. 645, 101 So. 586." ... See, ... also, the case of City of Troy et al. v. Murphree, ... 214 Ala. 118, 107 So. 83 ... ...
  • Pfingstl v. Solomon, 3 Div. 310.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 6, 1940
    ... ... [197 So. 13] ... Wm. J ... Fuller, Jr., of Montgomery, for appellant ... Bernard ... Lobman and Hill, Hill, Whiting & Rives, all of Montgomery, ... for appellees ... FOSTER, ... This is ... a proceeding to settle a controversy ... this court jurisdiction to proceed without objection, though ... the transcript does not show the filing of a bond. Lowry ... v. Hill, 211 Ala. 645, 101 So. 586. We referred to these ... cases in Murphy v. Freeman, 220 Ala. 634, 127 So ... 199, 70 A.L.R. 381. This is ... ...
  • Colbert County v. Tennessee Valley Bank
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 9, 1932
    ... ... Martinez, 162 Ala. 562, 50 So. 351; ... Boshell v. Phillips, 207 Ala. 628, 93 So. 576; ... Lewis v. Martin, 210 Ala. 401, 98 So. 635; Lowry ... v. Hill, 211 Ala. 645, 101 So. 586; City of Troy v ... Murphree, 214 Ala. 118, 107 So. 83; Thompson v ... State ex rel., 216 Ala. 348, 113 ... ...
  • Ralston Purina Co. v. Pierce, R-B
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • October 4, 1956
    ...was under submission here on the merits come too late. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. Currey, 175 Ala. 373, 57 So. 962; Lowry v. Hill, 211 Ala. 645, 101 So. 586. In our recent case of Terry v. Gresham, 254 Ala. 349, 48 So.2d 437, counsel for appellant in his oral argument made prior to s......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT