Lund v. State, 79-2229

Decision Date06 April 1981
Docket NumberNo. 79-2229,79-2229
Citation396 So.2d 255
PartiesJon Michael LUND, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and NESBITT, JJ.

SUBSTITUTED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from an order which revoked his probation and imposed the remaining term of his sentence. Because we find a basis supported by the record to warrant revocation, that feature of the order is affirmed. Page v. State, 363 So.2d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). In imposing sentence, the court indicated that the defendant was to be given credit for time served but did not specify the amount of time that was to be credited against his sentence as expressly required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1979); Ennis v. State, 364 So.2d 497 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). A proper application of Section 921.161(1), supra, mandates that the defendant be given credit for all time served. Baker v. Wainwright, 327 So.2d 8 (Fla.1976); Gallagher v. State, 300 So.2d 299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). However, a defendant, being held on numerous charges is not entitled to have credit for jail time pyramided by being given credit on each sentence as he awaits disposition of multiple and separate charges or cases. Miller v. State, 297 So.2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).

For the foregoing reasons, the order revoking the defendant's probation is affirmed but the sentence is reversed and remanded for proper sentencing.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Pendergrass v. State, s. 85-213
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 12, 1986
    ...section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1983), however, for the sentence must specify the credit for time already served. Lund v. State, 396 So.2d 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). The appellant thinks his previously served 226 days should on remand be deducted from the year's sentence for violation of......
  • Jablonskis v. State, 82-1097
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 24, 1982
    ...It may be that appellant is erroneously claiming credit for the same jail time against two or more sentences. See Lund v. State, 396 So.2d 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Lawrence v. State, 306 So.2d 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Miller v. State, 297 So.2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). The motion claims entit......
  • Rendall v. State, 84-238
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 31, 1984
    ...of time to which the appellant should be credited and therefore remand the matter to the trial court for resentencing. Lund v. State, 396 So.2d 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Scherer v. State, 366 So.2d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA Affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions. ...
  • King v. State, 82-2356
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 12, 1984
    ...in the county jail prior to the imposition of sentence as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1983). See Lund v. State, 396 So.2d 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Affirmed in part and ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT