Lyons v. Tiedemann

• Citation: 135 A.D.2d 509,522 N.Y.S.2d 159
• Parties: Arlene LYONS, etc., Respondent-Appellant, v. Donald C. TIEDEMANN, et al., Appellants-Respondents, O'Leary's Corral, et al., Respondents.
• Decision Date: 07 December 1987
• Court: New York Supreme Court Appellate Division

Page 159

522 N.Y.S.2d 159

135 A.D.2d 509

Arlene LYONS, etc., Respondent-Appellant, v. Donald C. TIEDEMANN, et al., Appellants-Respondents O'Leary's Corral, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division Second Department.

Dec. 7, 1987.

Peter T. Affatato, Hicksville (Clarence W. Williamson, Jr., of counsel), for appellant-respondent Tiedemann.

Rogan & Croutier, Garden City (John T. Ryan, on the brief), for appellant-respondent Hicksville Fire Dept.

Kenneth R. Torti, Garden City, for respondent-appellant.

Rivkin, Radler, Dunne & Bayh, Uniondale (John R. Dunne, Frank L. Amoroso and Rhonda S. Khan, of counsel), for respondents.

Before MANGANO, J.P., and BRACKEN, EIBER and KUNZEMAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages pursuant to General Obligations Law § 11-101, the defendants Tiedemann and the Hicksville Fire Department separately appeal, as limited by their respective briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ain, J.), dated January 16, 1986, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants O'Leary's Corral d/b/a O'Leary's and Bernard O'Leary (hereinafter the tavern and O'Leary) to dismiss any cross claims against them, and the plaintiff cross-appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of the order as granted that branch of the respondents' motion which was to dismiss the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents payable by the appellants-respondents and the respondent-appellant, with leave to the plaintiff, if she be so advised, to serve an amended complaint, pleading a cause of action against the tavern and O'Leary pursuant to General Obligations Law § 11-101 for loss of means of support, within 20 days after service upon her of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry, and with leave to the defendants Tiedemann and Hicksville Fire Department to replead their cross claims within 20 days after service upon them of a copy of the amended complaint.

The facts, as alleged in the complaint, demonstrate that the plaintiff's husband was struck and killed by an automobile operated by the defendant Tiedemann at the intersection of Route 107 and Old Country Road in Hicksville at approximately 8:50 P.M. on May 25, 1984. Tiedemann, a volunteer fireman with the defendant Hicksville Fire Department, was responding to a fire call at the time of the accident. The decedent had been a patron of the tavern and O'Leary for some time prior to the accident. The plaintiff subsequently commenced the instant action on behalf of the decedent's estate, the infant children, and herself, alleging, inter alia, that the tavern and O'Leary were liable for damages pursuant to General Obligations Law § 11-101 (i.e. the Dram Shop Act) inasmuch as the tavern, its agents and/or employees had continued to serve the decedent intoxicating drinks after they knew or should have known from his behavior that he had become intoxicated, and that his intoxication was responsible in part for his death. The Hicksville Fire Department, Tiedemann, and the defendant Town of Oyster Bay also asserted separate cross claims against the tavern and O'Leary for indemnification and contribution.

The tavern and O'Leary thereafter moved to dismiss the complaint and the cross claims as against them. By order dated January 16, 1986, the court (Ain, J.) granted the motions, dismissed the complaint and cross claims as against the tavern and...