Macaluso v. Alexander, Shumway & Utz Co.

Decision Date12 July 1960
CitationMacaluso v. Alexander, Shumway & Utz Co., 203 N.Y.S.2d 106, 11 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)
PartiesClaim of Louis MACALUSO, Respondent, v. ALEXANDER, SHUMWAY AND UTZ CO. and The State Insurance Fund, Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Charles G. Tierney, New York City, for appellants.

William J. Flynn, Mt. Morris, for claimant-respondent.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., for Workmen's Compensation Board(Daniel Polansky, New York City, of counsel).

Before BERGAN, P. J., and COON, GIBSON, HERLIHY and REYNORLDS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen's Compensation Board, apopellants contending that the accident which occurred while claimant was changing a tire on his own automobile while on his way to work and some miles away from the job location where he was employed as a carpenter, did not arise in the course of the employment.The board's decision to the contrary was predicated upon the findings that, in addition to regular wages, claimant was paid $1 per day for transportation to his place of work (some 35-40 miles distant) and that such payment 'was an inducement to obtain the necessary help.'It is abundantly clear from direct testimony and inference alike that it was necessary but difficult for the employer to get workmen from a distance; that there was no public transportation available from Mt. Morris where claimant lived; that about 18 months before the accident two other residents of Mt. Morris informed claimant that their 'boss had told them to hire a man who owned a car so that they could get to work, too, and [the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Ricciardi v. Aniero Concrete Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • December 4, 1973
    ...496), where the employee is traveling or transportation is provided or paid in part by the employer, (Matter of Macaluso v. Alexander, Shumway & Utz Co., 11 A.D.2d 838, 203 N.Y.S.2d 106 mot. for lv. to app. den. 8 N.Y.2d 708, 206 N.Y.S.2d 1026, 169 N.E.2d 926), or where the employee has bee......
  • Costa v. New York State Workmen's Compensation Bd.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 2, 1970
    ...496), where the employee is traveling or transportation is provided or paid in part by the employer, (Matter of Macaluso v. Alexander, Shumway & Utz Co., 11 A.D.2d 838, 203 N.Y.S.2d 106, mot. for lv. to app. den. 8 N.Y.2d 708, 206 N.Y.S.2d 1026, 169 N.E.2d 926), or where the employee has be......
  • Cornelius v. Brock
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 23, 1966
    ...of the job (Matter of Coressmann v. Moran & Sons, 4 A.D.2d 712, 713, 163 N.Y.S.2d 546, 547; and see Matter of Macaluso v. Alexander, Shumway & Utz Co., 11 A.D.2d 838, 203 N.Y.S.2d 106, mot. for lv. to app. den. 8 N.Y.2d 708, 206 N.Y.S.2d 1026, 169 N.E.2d 926). In such a case the travel beco......
  • Gardner v. Industrial Indem. Co., 7424
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • July 1, 1968
    ...no wages or compensation for the travel time involved. Counsel for appellant has cited one case, namely, Macalusa v. Alexander, Shumway & Utz Company, 11 A.D.2d 838, 203 N.Y.S.2d 106, contending the facts therein are similar to those in the case at bar. We find, however, that from the facts......
  • Get Started for Free