Maher v. Doe
Decision Date | 20 June 1977 |
Docket Number | No. 76-878,76-878 |
Citation | 97 S.Ct. 2474,432 U.S. 526,53 L.Ed.2d 534 |
Parties | Edward W. MAHER, etc. v. Donna DOE et al |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
The motion of appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
Appellees are mothers of illegitimate children who receive welfare benefits from the State of Connecticut under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program administered for the Federal Government by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW). They are prosecuting this litigation to challenge the constitutionality of § 52-440b, Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. (1977), which would require them, under pain of contempt, to divulge to appellant the names of the fathers of their children.
In 1975, after a three-judge District Court upheld the constitutionality of § 52-440b, we vacated the judgment and remanded for further consideration in light of an intervening amendment to § 402(a) of the Social Security Act,* and, if a relevant state proceeding was pending, in light of Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), and Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd., 420 U.S. 592, 95 S.Ct. 1200, 43 L.Ed.2d 482 (1975). Roe v. Norton, 422 U.S. 391, 95 S.Ct. 2221, 45 L.Ed.2d 268.
On remand the District Court held that the Younger/Huffman doctrine did not prohibit the issuance of an injunction in this case. 414 F.Supp. 1368 (Conn.1976). The court also held that § 52-440b remained valid provided the Connecticut welfare authorities first determine, in accordance with § 402(a) of the federal statute, that the appellees did not have "good cause" for refusing to cooperate, under standards which take into account the "best interests of the child." 414 F.Supp., at 1381.
Noting that the Secretary of HEW has not yet promulgated regulations defining "good cause" and "best interests of the child," appellant reads the District Court's opinion as enjoining any state proceedings under § 52-440b until such guidance is forthcoming. But the court's opinion contains the following passage in a footnote:
". . . (T)he wiser course is to require the Commissioner, if he is unable to determine without the aid of specific regulations that his proposed enforcement action is not against the best interests of the child, to postpone any enforcement until the new regulations have been issued and approved." 414 F.Supp., at 1381 n. 20.
Though it is somewhat ambiguous, the quoted portion can be read to require appellant to make his own determination of "good cause" and "best interests of the child" if he is able to do so without the aid of the HEW regulations. If this is the correct reading, appellant's apprehension that he is presently barred from proceeding in accordance with § 52-440b would be erroneous.
The day after the District Court issued its opinion on remand a new Connecticut statute became effective, 1976 Conn.Pub. Act No. 76-334, Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 17-82b. In pertinent part that statute provides:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
BJRL v. State of Utah
...and again was reversed and remanded by the Supreme Court for specific determinations under the federal statute. Maher v. Doe, 432 U.S. 526, 97 S.Ct. 2474, 53 L.Ed.2d 534 (1977). The Supreme Court in both of its rulings did not find it necessary to reach the constitutional questions because ......
-
Johnson v. Kelly
...statute, see Doe v. Maher, 414 F.Supp. 1368, 1374-75 (D.Conn.1976) (three-judge court), vacated on other grounds, ___ U.S. ___, 97 S.Ct. 2474, 53 L.Ed.2d 534 (1977). 18 The very fact that dismissal is the proper disposition of a case in which Younger abstention is found appropriate, Ahrensf......
-
Harris v. Rae, 79-1268
... ... Cf. Maher v. Roe , 432 U.S. 464, 97 S.Ct. 2376, 53 L.Ed.2d 484. P. 315 ... (b) Regardless of whether the freedom of a woman to choose to terminate her pregnancy for health reasons lies at the core or the periphery of the due process liberty recognized in Wade, supra , it does not ... ...
-
New Jersey-Philadelphia Presbytery of the Bible Presbyterian Church v. New Jersey State Bd. of Higher Ed.
...539 F.2d at 343 (emphasis added). Similarly, in Doe v. Maher, 414 F.Supp. 1368 (D.Conn.1976), vacated on other grounds, 432 U.S. 526, 97 S.Ct. 2474, 53 L.Ed.2d 534 (1977), the district court noted (t)he fact that the adult plaintiffs in this action, with the exception of the intervenor, Lin......